We don't all the reasons for the fire sale of Smith. Maybe he was voicing displeasure at Hafley's defense? Since the production of the entire D Line compared to last season has declined remarkably, some push back could be starting to percolate? I'm not saying that's true but there are probably some reasons that the fans don't know that contributed towards the fire sale.
Yeah if his career is going to be salvaged it may be by adding some weight and moving inside. He is much better off going in one direction rather than trying to bull rush a tackle when he has no flexibility in hips. He hasn't even shown glimmers of what I think was expected when he was drafted.
I wouldn't hold your breath on a "new look". As I posted elsewhere, Smith has been rotating in and out all season, with the number of his snaps slowly declining. Against the Lions, he was only in for 21 defensive snaps or 37% of the plays. Opening game, 54 snaps, 71%.
By "a new look" I only meant we are going to see different players more often. But it will affect pass rush and holding down the run. Either for the good or it won't change much. imho
Thanks for posting the interesting article. Goes to show that Smith must have been well respected and had a good relationship with Gute. He asked to be traded and Gute obliged his wishes. I think the mutual respect in this story is the type of action that pays dividends to the Packers because it's seen as a player friendly organization. It would seem to work in the Packers favor in signing free agents if pay is competitive.Smith asked to be traded. Explains the low return.
Preston Smith Explains Why He Requested Trade From Packers
Smith on Tuesday was dealt to the Steelers in exchange for a 2025 seventh-round pick.www.si.com
LVN is 6'-5", 272 lbs. "Average" 4-3 DE's are 6'-4", 265-285. That would make LVN prototypical in size (Rashan Gary is 6'-5", 277 lbs). LVN was only 21 when drafted, had a RAS score of 9.39, and was nicknamed "Hercules" for his strength/power. What part of that sceams tweener for a DE? Sounds, to me, like an ideal mid-1st round pick. I haven't been disappointed & he's only going to get better as he's also described as a "student of the game" by Gary.
I'm thinking that's a click-bait story. I'm not finding any info on this. He hurt his MCL in week 1, so possibky a re-aggravation if true?
LVN has 1 sack this season in 9 games. That sack came when the qb was flushed into his arms. He's also had very few tackles or TFL's. He's had nearly zero impact this season. While technically a DE, he's rushing the passer mostly on the outside of the tackle similar to an OLB edge rusher in a 3-4. He's not well suited for that role. I think he may have more success rushing on the inside where he might have more success using his strength for a bull rush and not be as inclined to bend around the edge. At this point his RAS score seems irrelevant because he's nearly invisible out there.
I think and hope that you are correct and I should have researched it better, before posting. I am also not finding anything else to collaborate the "Schefter Story". This was the only thing I found and as you said, someone having some fun and manipulating his original tweet from Sept.
Not sure that comparing to Gary right now helps LVN's status, unless we want to look for a guy to piddle along for a few years, come out of his shell long enough to qualify for a huge contract, and...
. A ton of motivation for players in a contract year to go all out, play injured, hope for some luck and then they are rewarded with enough money to live comfortably forever.
According to Tom Silverstein, Pittsburgh takes on his pro-rated $3.2mil + 900K per game
Yes. Many of forget that many of our players are Rookie, 1st or 2nd year players. Couple that with the decision to not only switch DC’s, but really start from scratch in an entirely new System on the Defensive side. The reality we are left with is we made a substantial conversion on Defense. A more typical expectation would be in the second or third year where we are able to analyze our current group and make adjustments. Then ideally address the weaker links in the following FA and draft etc.
Way to shine that crystal ball... Yannick Ngakoue was just released by the Ravens. Win a waiver claim & he may be that 4-3 DE you were hoping for? 6'-2", 246 lbs so considerably smaller than LVN & all others on depth chart but for $657k (remainder of '24) may be situational pass rusher?
I don't know him at all well. But based on his salary and that he was just let go and has played on various team; I think we want to try our guys first.Way to shine that crystal ball... Yannick Ngakoue was just released by the Ravens. Win a waiver claim & he may be that 4-3 DE you were hoping for? 6'-2", 246 lbs so considerably smaller than LVN & all others on depth chart but for $657k (remainder of '24) may be situational pass rusher?
Best stat years were as 4-3 DE, and has played for 6 teams already... maybe our turn?
Interesting. There’s a high probability that the Packers are shopping at filling a spot at DE. While in the short term we should function ok, we didn’t address the position in the last draft because we had a sizable group of what I’d call “tweeners”. Guys that can play that role in a pinch, but not necessarily an ideal fit or more a better fit at OLB in a 3-4. The Packers have an opportunity to really add someone who can be a designed fit and I can’t stress this point enough. It’s really not ideal to just switch players around “on a dime” like we’ve done. Ideally you go after someone who’s got some experience or even possible someone that’s played for Hafley or that Design in the recent past.Way to shine that crystal ball... Yannick Ngakoue was just released by the Ravens. Win a waiver claim & he may be that 4-3 DE you were hoping for? 6'-2", 246 lbs so considerably smaller than LVN & all others on depth chart but for $657k (remainder of '24) may be situational pass rusher?
Best stat years were as 4-3 DE, and has played for 6 teams already... maybe our turn?
