D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
And yet nearly every one of your posts on the matter is positive Rodgers and negative towards the organization. Weird.
As @Schultz correctly pointed out, criticizing the front office doesn't make me less of a fan of the team as one that agrees with every move made by them.
nobody doesnt appreciate what he has done. They are just realistic at where his skill level an attitude is currently at. You have repeatedly insisted he is still playing at a high level. Yet watching him now and clips of 10 years ago it is very obvious he is no longer what he once was.
What the heck are you talking about? Before Rodgers broke his thumb he put up amazing numbers in the past 38 starts, completing 69.6% of his 1,225 throws for 9,571 yards, 95 touchdowns and only 12 interceptions for a passer rating of 114.37. Of course he's not a same player as he was 10 years ago but there's no doubt he was still an elite QB.
then explain it. How will next years revenues suffer because of Rodgers absence? Will ticket holders demand their money back? Will folks eat fewer brats at the stadium? Will the NFL withhold the TV revenues? This is the hero worship ideas that seem to show a greater appreciation for Rodgers than the Packers.
It's entirely possible a portion of fans won't show up for games or spend less at Lambeau with the team struggling. It won't result in a significant drop-off in local revenue being created but there's a chance it won't be on par with past seasons.
So you think that Rodgers is so amazing that the Jets would value having him for one year as for two? And that being unsure that he even wants to play wouldn't matter? That he is so awesome they should trade just to be associated with his greatness?
You don't understand it. Of course Rodgers' age diminishes his trade value. My point is the Jets didn't need Rodgers to tell them about it on the McAfee show, they were well aware about it long before that.
I can't understand how people just don't see the obvious. Are they so blinded by their love of Rodgers that they actually think the Packers are going to just lose all their fans and be cut out of the media deal that the other 31 teams are in on, because Rodgers is gone? I got news for them, the majority of Packer fans want Rodgers gone. Further, a majority of those fans know that Rodgers gives the Packers a better chance of winning in 2023, but are fine starting the "post Rodgers era" a year or 2 early. This isn't about Rodgers play on the field, it is more about his play off the field.
I highly doubt the majority of Packers fans want Rodgers gone. While the Packers won't lose most fans because of him being traded there will be some who won't show up for games, spent less money on merchandise etc. There's a distinct chance that the local revenue created by the team will significantly regress if the team struggles for an extended period of time.
That's exactly what you said last year. And wasn't to our benefit
I'm convinced the Packers would have been worse without Rodgers last season.
So you think Gute is immune to popular opinion?
There's no way a general manager of an NFL team should allow public opinion to have an impact on his decision.
I would agree with that, but you also have to factor in money and other variables. Without restarting the whole rationale behind trading Aaron Rodgers discussion, on the field performance is probably near the bottom or not even on the list of reasons for trading him.
On the field performance should be the most important factor in those decisions though.
Just like the shared revenue from media contracts, the NFL has made sure that 40% of the ticket sales are evenly distributed. I do not see the Packers 60% of their home tickets sales ever going down. Unless, you want to factor playoff ticket sales, which they didn't have any in 2022.
The Packers are tied for third in the league in home playoff games since Rodgers became the starter. While they didn't make the playoffs last season their success generated additional revenue over the past 15 years.
Another little tidbit I learned about revenue sharing, the revenue made on NFL licensed jerseys and other gear, is equally split among teams. So if you buy an Aaron Rodgers jersey, all of the profits from that sale do not go directly into the Packers hands, only 1/32nd of it.
That's not true for merchandise being bought in the Packers Pro Shop but only for nationally generated revenue (NFL.com shop for example).
Last season was much different. He looked poised and patient. He went through his progression and snapped those passes in accurately. His pocket movement and awareness was good but could be better.
Love threw most of his passes to his first read, especially against the Eagles. We will have to wait and see how well he can go through his progressions as well as deal with opponents blitzing him until the regular season.
Why is it so surprising to some fans That the Packers would move on from a soon to be 40 year old QB coming off his near career worst season?
It's not surprising at all. It's mind-boggling how many fans can't wait for Rodgers to be run out of town as they expect the Packers will be as successful without him though.