Spanky
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2017
- Messages
- 630
- Reaction score
- 396
John Middlekauff says Love will not be the starting QB next year:
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
Yes I do put the blame on that int on Love. Reed had to wait for the ball to come to him. If the ball had been delivered on target he would have been walking into the end zone. I'll admit that I am judging the throws from what I saw the last 16 years before so maybe I am expecting too much but I am seeing far too many 50/50 type balls where proper ball placement would make a huge difference. When both the receiver and the DB get their hands on the ball at the same time there is a good chance we won't like the outcome. (Completion vs. incompletion or interception)
Do you realize that over 65% of the league doesn’t get a second contract?John Middlekauff says Love will not be the starting QB next year:
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
It's like you didn't read what I said. I said simply that he has to start throwing the long ball better. He has not been very accurate with that.Watch the All-22 film, you cannot just toss it deep or intermediate if the play call or design is for shorter...or no one is open elsewhere.
Just the law of averages makes it unlikely we'll have a third straight HOF quarterback, as much as I'd like one. The next question is can we win a Super Bowl with an average type NFL QB?Overall I think Love can be an average type NFL starting QB. Get a couple upgrades on OL and maybe one more weapon and allow these young guys to mature. I’m not sure he’s built for HOF like we’re used to. Average won’t work if we have a 22pts+ allowed per game Defense
I even went back and reread…you said he’s using a dump option too much.It's like you didn't read what I said. I said simply that he has to start throwing the long ball better. He has not been very accurate with that.
You can’t compare Aaron 1st starter to Love this year. You just can’tThe reason Aaron is a more appropriate comparison is that he also was not a rookie and had three years experience. Comparing it to true rookies like Peyton walking onto a 3-13 team with a new coach and starting five months out of college doesn't make sense. Love is stepping into a system he's been studying for 3 years under a very good head coach.
Bucs did with Trent DilferJust the law of averages makes it unlikely we'll have a third straight HOF quarterback, as much as I'd like one. The next question is can we win a Super Bowl with an average type NFL QB?
We all know the history of Rodgers since then. And I believe we concluded that Rodgers took over for a better Packer team on paper than Love has now. MLF had 3 super seasons with a HOF QB. Then it fell apart. MM was one play from the SB with a HOF QB and then had a 6-10 season.You can’t compare Aaron 1st starter to Love this year. You just can’t
last year with better wr group aaron had his worse ever stat season and he had an online that was better then now
this year it’s even a worse wr group and online
thats the closest comparison we have . Last year to this year .
I’ve done it already . but go back to last year threads and the majority won’t blame Aaron because the line sucked and the wr sucked
this year no one wants to use same reasoning . It’s baffling
Not sure on Love there. If he throws deeper over the top it is probably incomplete but not intercepted. But how many Vikings were there when he the ball arrived? Was he throwing into coverage? Lazard probably makes that catch because of his height and strength.
Defense, but if those are the only examples, we're in trouble.Bucs did with Trent Dilfer
Denver with a bad Manning
Bears got there with freaking Rex Grossman
what is the common denominator there?
Grossman had his chance.Defense, but if those are the only examples, we're in trouble.
Besides, the Bears lost, and Manning is a HOFer (even if his contributions in Denver were minimal). So the only legitimate example there is Dilfer - who is, not coincidentally, the guy everybody points to in cases like this.
Yes I do put the blame on that int on Love. Reed had to wait for the ball to come to him. When both the receiver and the DB get their hands on the ball at the same time there is a good chance we won't like the outcome. (Completion vs. incompletion or interception)
The law of statistics say that the odds of a player becoming a HOF player is independant of any previous QB. So if a HOF QB is a 1% chance, that is what it is for Love. What is the odds our or any other teams next 3 will be HOF? That is 1% to the 3rd power.Just the law of averages makes it unlikely we'll have a third straight HOF quarterback, as much as I'd like one. The next question is can we win a Super Bowl with an average type NFL QB?
and of course consider also that this amounts to three examples in 23 years, the most recent of which was now nearly a decade ago.Defense, but if those are the only examples, we're in trouble.
Besides, the Bears lost, and Manning is a HOFer (even if his contributions in Denver were minimal). So the only legitimate example there is Dilfer - who is, not coincidentally, the guy everybody points to in cases like this.
Yeah but you also commented about the long ball. Which he is not throwing very well and needs to imo. And I understand sometimes nobody is open and you have to dump it off. I just think he is using the dump off more than he has to. It is just a gut feeling but I believe it is his security blanket right now and possibly he is not really seeing the other receivers very well. You can say nobody is ever open on those plays. But I'm doubting that. He may need to get out of the pocket more.I even went back and reread…you said he’s using a dump option too much.
Yes. When MLF was selected by GB I remember reading about how robust that system was. Specifically that his scheme is NOT predicated on Superior or Elite QB play. Ideally you have a 49ers Defense, which we obviously. don’t. I’d rather have a top 5 Defense and top 12 Offense than the reverse. Remember 2014? It was basically a top #13 Defense playing above their heads.Just the law of averages makes it unlikely we'll have a third straight HOF quarterback, as much as I'd like one. The next question is can we win a Super Bowl with an average type NFL QB?
People always say that but you if anyone should know that’s not imperative. You just suffered through THREE 13 Win seasons with a HOF QB. The other side is that There have been plenty of Elite QB’s who didn’t win a SBUltimately, it's been pretty proven that to be a Super Bowl contender a team needs a QB playing at a high level. The Ravens were a huge anomaly. They won something like 7 games in a row with just FGs. That's not a recipe that is going to win a lot of Super Bowls. I'd rather do it the proven way with a franchise QB. I don't think Love is the guy. I've been pretty ******* him, but in the same respect, I don't want to waste a couple seasons finding out what we already know. What I would say is that there is a slew of QBs I would not trade Love for: Purdy, Minshew, Mayfield, Carr, Dobbs, Howell, Wilson, Jones, Tannehill, Watson, Ridder, Garoppolo, Pickett, Jones, Wilson.
There's a couple guys that I would be on the fence about. I'd probably be okay with a straight up trade for Bryce Young and and Dak. I don't think they would take you to the promised land, but they are probably better. It probably would make sense to bring them on if they don't serve you the ultimate goal. I don't think I would be on board with Justin Fields either. He has proven to be pretty inaccurate and doesn't seem to have the ability to read a defense. I don't think I would be on board with a Geno Smith trade either.
Guys I would trade for: Stroud, Jackson, Stafford, Burrow, Lawrence, Goff, Hurts, Allen, Mahomes, Herbert and Tua.
Obviously, this is all just talking points. It does help to put it into perspective though. Love is just kind of a middling dude. He's not going to be a franchise guy. However, there is a lot worse. I mean, the Packers have lost to them (Ridder). Stick the season out and then see where we are at. It's really all we can do. It's just what we do after that's important. I say bring in one of the big dogs from college and create a QB competition.
Yeah but you also commented about the long ball. Which he is not throwing very well and needs to imo. And I understand sometimes nobody is open and you have to dump it off. I just think he is using the dump off more than he has to. It is just a gut feeling but I believe it is his security blanket right now and possibly he is not really seeing the other receivers very well. You can say nobody is ever open on those plays. But I'm doubting that. He may need to get out of the pocket more.
I don't think I can agree with this. Mahomes, Stafford, Brady, Mahomes, Brady, Foles, Brady, Manning, Brady, Wilson, Flacco, Manning, Rodgers, Brees, Roethlisberger...People always say that but you if anyone should know that’s not imperative. You just suffered through THREE 13 Win seasons with a HOF QB. The other side is that There have been plenty of Elite QB’s who didn’t win a SB
I’m convinced it’s not only not necessary, but it’s imperative to have a proper balance of Defense to Offense.
I’d take a regular top 10-16 QB if you gave me a Bill Belichick for DC. I don’t care if that’s Jordan or whoever.
and when I look across those we see teams with great Defenses. How many of those SB’s were won with a Defense ranked outside theI don't think I can agree with this. Mahomes, Stafford, Brady, Mahomes, Brady, Foles, Brady, Manning, Brady, Wilson, Flacco, Manning, Rodgers, Brees, Roethlisberger...
Foles and Flacco are probably the only QBs from the last 15 QBs that would be a top 10-16. The rest are tops of all time. I think there is a good case that a team needs a franchise QB to be successful. Now, I agree it is a team sport and it does need balance. I'll take a franchise QB all day before any defensive coordinator. That's just me though.