tynimiller
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 15,088
- Reaction score
- 5,695
If you go King instead of Jones...i think there is enough left to resign Lane who may step back into starting role if Wagner and Turner are cap casualties
I think that's how Gluten is leaning as well. And RBs have shorter shelf lives than DBs, so yeah, between the two, keep King.
Was Jones 3rd string at the beginning of his rookie year?No, Dillon might have the potential to be a good receiver, but he wouldn't be third-string if he was an excellent runner and good receiver too.
Assuming that Alexander continues his upward trend I don’t see the Packers paying as much as other teams are willing to for King to be their #1 CB. I think King is likely to play himself out of town.I think that's how Gluten is leaning as well. And RBs have shorter shelf lives than DBs, so yeah, between the two, keep King.
Was Jones 3rd string at the beginning of his rookie year?
If you go King instead of Jones...i think there is enough left to resign Lane who may step back into starting role if Wagner and Turner are cap casualties
If lane Taylor starts and plays well this season how much do you think he could get on open market? And how much less than the 12 m per that Jones is likely to get do you think king would command. The minimum I see king getting is 10 m per and honestly that number might be low. I get king is not jalen ramsey (21m per) but how far behind is he, certainly king is much better than half as good as ramsey
That is provided king stays healthy and puts up 4 or more picks again...
1: Its probably not a great i dea to use the Ramsey contract as a guage for King
2: I don't think you fully appreciate just how good Ramsey is with that last part.
Interesting how it tends to work that way. Generally takes a while to get acclimated to the men’s league. Need to give Dillon time to develop as well.
Had to giggle when I saw Ramsey’s reported extension numbers. Extraordinary payout with about 75% guaranteed in a cap environment that possibly could be viewed as stagnant for seasons 20-22. Very, very risky imo.1: Its probably not a great i dea to use the Ramsey contract as a guage for King
2: I don't think you fully appreciate just how good Ramsey is with that last part.
You might be right on the 15M per year. It only takes one overeager and desperate GM to pull the trigger in those first 48 hours of free agency. I’d be floored if the Packers would even consider it though.First im not comparing king to ramsey as equals...I'm saying king is in the tier below.
So king has played 30 of 48 games in 3 years, ramsey has played 60/64 games in 4 years. On one hand that means ramsey is very available and king less than ideally available. But how many more ints do you think ramsey has in those 30 extra games? Ramsey has 10 to kings 6.
Once again I'm not saying they on the same level I'm just saying king is gonna get paid a lot of money in free agency next year if he puts together a similar season to 2019. He's an athletic 6-3 corner with above average ball skills. With an identical season to 2019, 5 picks 15 pds I'd guess hed get around 15 m per from someone and net the Packers a 3rd round comp pick
Was Jones 3rd string at the beginning of his rookie year?
No, but he was behind a fellow rookie and a converted WR.Yes, was Jones a 2nd round pick?
Yes, was Jones a 2nd round pick?
This 3rd string dog crap....folks Adams came in as a "3rd string" WR behind Nelson and Cobb.
I get it, some feel Dillon was a waste of a pick, others (raise my hand very high) think it wasn't the pick for that spot....but folks step back from the ledge and allow unbias thoughts to filter in.
**and before anyone claims I said as much, I am not stating Dillon is going to become arguably one of the top 3-5 guys at his position as Davante arguably has accomplished by making this statement.
Jones is if anything underutilized. He can catch balls more and that hasn't been utilized well. I hope we retain Jones.
Everytime, we get a star player who deserves a raise, we get a rinse and repeat of this conversation. If only we can field a team of bargain basement finds and win a SB....
I agree mostly. He caught 50 passes last year. That is pretty good. I don't want to use him up. We have two other backs that should be able spell him. If we sign him; we are in it for the long haul.Jones is if anything underutilized. He can catch balls more and that hasn't been utilized well. I hope we retain Jones.
Everytime, we get a star player who deserves a raise, we get a rinse and repeat of this conversation. If only we can field a team of bargain basement finds and win a SB....
As I stated earlier in discussions with Dillon's draft position.
The difference being a 3rd string receiver can and will be on the field at the same time with the #1 and #2 WRs.
That is not the case with running backs.
And no, this is not me saying Dillon is some bum. I hope and expect he takes Williams touches.
Hey XPack, with all due respect, I disagree on Jones's utilization. He had 19 touchdowns last year, I think 15 were rushing and 4 were through the air. Not sure what more a guy can do. Or maybe I'm missing something in your comment.Jones is if anything underutilized. He can catch balls more and that hasn't been utilized well. I hope we retain Jones.
Everytime, we get a star player who deserves a raise, we get a rinse and repeat of this conversation. If only we can field a team of bargain basement finds and win a SB....
I agree quick. The only reason dillon is listed behind Williams is that Dillon is a rookie. He should ascend to the #2 back by mid-season, and replace Jones next year if Jones walks.Dillon wasn't a 2nd round pick either, the Packers just chose to take him in 2nd. Haha just kidding but not really
Don't worry man dillon is gonna get some touches no matter where he's listed on the depth chart.
And once again dillon is the backup to Aaron jones. There's no way jamal williams would be the feature back over dillon
Makes sense. I don't expect Turner to be around next year. We'll see about Wagner. Lane is a possibility, OR they take a RT early in the draft. FA would be too expensive.If you go King instead of Jones...i think there is enough left to resign Lane who may step back into starting role if Wagner and Turner are cap casualties