I'm sorry but it's not my responsibility to prove one of your points. If you believe there's another legit reason aside of Crosby's lack of leg strength for the Packers to go for it more often than other teams on fourth down do the research on your own and back it up.
As a side note, I wasn't talking about me having presented a ton of facts on that specific topic but about Crosby being a below average kicker for most of his tenure over the past few years.
BTW as you brought in PFF's grades regarding Alexander (something you have continued to ignore you were completely off base) here's Crosby's rankings on kickoffs according to them:
Among the 32 kickers with the most attempts on kickoffs he's dead last in grade (22.0, next one at 31.6, 27 above 50), yards per attempt (61.4, they actually track the average yards the ball travelled even if it results in a touchback), percentage returned (80.6%, next closest at 53.8%) and hang time (3.60 seconds, something you claimed Bisaccia has him kick shorter but higher kicks).
That's actually pretty embarassing for the NFL website.
No, it's pretty easy to find accurate stats. If you take a closer look at the one's posted on Wikipedia they don't have any information for this season in which Crosby is 0-for-2 on 50+ yard field goals. Therefore he's 42-for-76 (55.3%) over his career.
FYI if you're interested in up-to-date, accurate numbers Pro Football Reference is the website to use. Here's a link to Crosby's profile:
Checkout the latest stats for Mason Crosby. Get info about his position, age, height, weight, college, draft, and more on Pro-football-reference.com.
www.pro-football-reference.com
That's where I completely disagree. The numbers (actually nearly every single random metric that has been brought up over the past few years) strongly suggests that Crosby has been a below average kicker for most of his career. Yet Packers fans tend to ignore it for some unknown reason.
Prove me wrong.