Then you've just exposed your own prejudicial bias against him. No matter how well he plays in any given game, even if he theoretically earned MLF's game ball, you've already decided he won't be "solid" in that game?
There are a miriade of high-quality payment-free options online as well.
Incorrect. My statement was in response to a claim he has been a good slot corner. Not he was good in a game, series or play….of course any player can be good in any given play, series or game.
It's not illegal any way. It falls under the FCC free-to-air rules. Any broadcast media that you can view through equipment that you own is legal to view. This was extended to online streams in 2014. The legal burden lies with the streamers, not the viewers.
Did you not say you will never refer to him as anything other than average no matter what, even if for a day?
I heard that from someone in Canada. He has same thing and that's what he said
I've been watching streams from the same website for 4 years now. Occasionally they get shut down but now most of them are routed through offshore servers. Packers, Blues and Illini games and I rarely miss one. There is a gray area though in that if you share links to such streams publicly, you risk liability as a distributor if some overzealous federal agent can't find anything better to do. This gray area has never been pursued in court though, at least as of an article on Wired that I read last winter.
As long as people don't start to post links to streaming sites that are on the wrong side of the law, our rules say this discussion is OK. Inst-ban and delete once the links show up.
I did not. That statement you quoted was speaking overall, unless a shift happens - which would be great to see, overall I’ll never state that. He could easily have a good game or series or play.
Good policy.
I've noticed that there seems to be more trash talking after a play this season, with no flags thrown. Did the NFL change/soften-up on that rule? Seems like in the past, flags flew pretty fast anytime there was a hint of taunting.
Im not sure and I’m not a conspiracy theorist but that game looked very contrived as far as Refereeing goes. You can’t convince me no one saw that. The Network even replayed it several times it was so dirty.
It seems like every season, especially at the beginning, the Refs are calling a real tight game and sometimes, they seem to be focusing on things that they let go the previous season. Guessing the offseason for refs consists of the people in charge looking at complaints and game film. Deciding what they need to improve on, maybe suggesting some rule changes to the Owners. This year it was the O-Lines and if they were lined up correctly that was under a lot of scrutiny.
I was at the game last year against the Chiefs at Lambeau and the Chiefs were belly aching that there wasn't an interference call on a long pass to MVS towards the end of the game. What they didn't want to talk about were some bad calls, that went against the Packers prior to that play.
I’m now in Buckeye az 112 degrees and is the a sports package you have? I have not seen this one here
I think sometimes when there's an issue comes up the league tries to straddle the fence with the rule changes and the rest kind of get caught in the middle and hung out to dry.
Oh I agree on being consistent. Whether it is the first or the last play of the game, call it consistently.
Couldn't give you a like because I'm not sure about the GPS thing. Maybe try it out in colleges for a couple years first.
