The Packers have announced that they've released WR Kevin Dorsey.
Damn you beat me to it lol
http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/8621/kevin-dorsey
The Packers have announced that they've released WR Kevin Dorsey.
I disagree with this premise. He's going to have a biased opinion in either direction. He does provide insight to this player but the scouts are better able to provide a better overall assessment of his value relative to other players while incorporating the additional info.As a side note, Montgomery's first contribution will likely be input on whether Jordan Phillips would be worth the #30 pick as the draft board is constructed. I doubt anybody on the scouting staff would have better insight than his college position coach.
I see your disagree and raise you a disagree.I disagree with this premise. He's going to have a biased opinion in either direction. He does provide insight to this player but the scouts are better able to provide a better overall assessment of his value relative to other players while incorporating the additional info.
I agree. Montgomery is in a unique position to evaluate Phillips and it would be extremely short-sighted for him to provide anything other than an honest evaluation. But the proof will be in the pudding and Phillips may not be one of the highest rated players when the Packers pick, no matter Montgomery's report.Area scouts (and on up the scouting ladder) rely upon their connections in the college coaching ranks for info you can't get from the tape, particularly study habits, conditioning habits, leadership qualities, coachability, "citizenship", position room work...all the stuff you can't know without being in the facility every day.
I agree, Montgomery would provide a lot of inside info on this player, and it should be taken very seriously and incorporated into the assessment.I see your disagree and raise you a disagree.
Area scouts (and on up the scouting ladder) rely upon their connections in the college coaching ranks for info you can't get from the tape, particularly study habits, conditioning habits, leadership qualities, coachability, "citizenship", position room work...all the stuff you can't know without being in the facility every day.
Further, while a college coach might want to burnish his own image by touting the wonderful players he produces, those kinds of exaggerations or deceits, even if they're happy talk self-deceptions, gives their reputation for talent assessment a short half-life. The proof is in the putting. Word gets around about who regularly gets it right and who regularly gets it wrong.
In Montgomery's case, an accurate assessment is more acutely in his interest than the opinion of an outsider. It goes directly to his performance evaluation.
In this case, Phillips looks like one of those nimble big men who plays smaller than his size. Conditioning? Motor? Fundamentals? A simple lack of meanness? Avoids the weight room? Extenuating circumstances, like poor scheme fit or nagging injuries that didn't keep him out of games?
For the Packers to not value Montgomery's input on a player he position coached, particularly one at a position of need slotted by many around the #30 pick, would be foolish.
No argument there. It is one just one player, even if it is a position and player of particular interest. It's just a first order of business for Montgomery since there ain't much coaching going on right now. My response was directed at your "biased" comment.I agree, Montgomery would provide a lot of inside info on this player, and it should be taken very seriously and incorporated into the assessment.
Montgomery has no idea however if his guy should have a value of 25th, 35th or 50th pick. He's not a scout and doesn't have applicable knowledge of other players in the draft.
If you re-read my earlier response, I think you'll find that I stated this. He's got the inside dope on one prospect.
Montgomery might have insight as to whether Phillips eats too much pudding.I agree. Montgomery is in a unique position to evaluate Phillips and it would be extremely short-sighted for him to provide anything other than an honest evaluation. But the proof will be in the pudding and Phillips may not be one of the highest rated players when the Packers pick, no matter Montgomery's report.
Alright, alright, alright (McConaughey voice)! Looks like we have no need to waste a pick on a LB now. This makes 2 years in a row that Teddy has made a "splash" signing and I couldn't be happier! This stud lined up next to Carl Bradford is going to make teams think twice about running up the middle. OK, truth is I have had a crap day for the ages and needed a laugh. In reality I dig stories like these and you never know, maybe the kid can play? I wish him well but again I composed this post for nothing more than selfish reasons. Carry on...The Packers have officially signed LB Josh Francis (6-0, 238). After going undrafted out of West Virginia in 2013 he played for the Winnipeg Blue Bombers of the CFL in 2014 and the Wichita Falls Nighthawks of the Indoor Football League in 2015.
Packers inform DuJuan Harris they won't tender him meaning Harris will become a free agent.
I hope we draft a RB in the middle rounds. Either that, or bring in someone like CJ Spiller for cheap.
Packers have put exclusive rights tender on safety Chris Banjo.
What's the difference between the exclusive rights tender and 1st/2nd/original pick tender?
Now that I think of it, what's the difference between an early rights free agent and a restricted free agent?
An exclusive rights free agent is a player whose contract has expired and has three or fewer tenured years in the league.
As I understand it, Banjo does not have 3 accrued years thereby does not qualify for a restricted FA tender. He's signed at the vet minimum and will qualify for restricted FA status next season.An exclusive rights free agent is a player whose contract has expired and has three or fewer tenured years in the league.