Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
stats lie. They were much better in week 2 than in week 1 and it showed in offensive production. But Week1? Give me a ******* break. you have to be blind to think the offensive line was remotely adequate that game. someone was getting whipped on almost every play, and badly. Coupled with not being able to run the ball. It was great LOL
I'm not going to dig too deep into this, because like you, I thought the OL looked terrible against the Bears. However, when ranking an entire OL, if they are adding up all 5 positions and their individual grades added up give them a final grade for the OL, I can see how the results could be deceptive. In that situation, I can see as a collective whole, the Packer OL ranks pretty high. But all that means is that you could have 1-2 weak links and even though they sucked, the other 3 guys played well enough to bring the total score up.
Last edited: