Then you've just exposed your own prejudicial bias against him. No matter how well he plays in any given game, even if he theoretically earned MLF's game ball, you've already decided he won't be "solid" in that game?
There are a miriade of high-quality payment-free options online as well.
Incorrect. My statement was in response to a claim he has been a good slot corner. Not he was good in a game, series or play….of course any player can be good in any given play, series or game.
It's not illegal any way. It falls under the FCC free-to-air rules. Any broadcast media that you can view through equipment that you own is legal to view. This was extended to online streams in 2014. The legal burden lies with the streamers, not the viewers.
Did you not say you will never refer to him as anything other than average no matter what, even if for a day?
I heard that from someone in Canada. He has same thing and that's what he said
I've been watching streams from the same website for 4 years now. Occasionally they get shut down but now most of them are routed through offshore servers. Packers, Blues and Illini games and I rarely miss one. There is a gray area though in that if you share links to such streams publicly, you risk liability as a distributor if some overzealous federal agent can't find anything better to do. This gray area has never been pursued in court though, at least as of an article on Wired that I read last winter.
As long as people don't start to post links to streaming sites that are on the wrong side of the law, our rules say this discussion is OK. Inst-ban and delete once the links show up.
