If an NFL team doesn't need to honor a contract then why does the player? I know you think your answering the question by repeating that it's in the contract that they're allowed to cut him in order not to pay him. Well its also in his power to hold out. You simply dont like the idea of a player holding out. There is pretty much zero difference. Both are exercising their right and their ability to do what they feel is best for them.
No, there is a huge difference between a player holding out and a team waiving that player. The former is a breach of the contract, which can lead to fines and a return of a portion of the player’s signing bonus, and the latter is not. I understand you are in favor of players holding out but that is not a reason to misrepresent the facts. An NFL team which waives a player is honoring the contract as long as they pay the player all the money they guaranteed in the contract.
And I know you keep bringing up how much they make already as if to illustrate your point. This is another thing that annoys me. Yes 7 millions a TON of cash. Guess what??? If you have the chance to make 14 and believe your deserving of it from an ability standpoint you'll do most anything in your power to get it. Otherwise you simply sound like somebody that ls hating on a guy that's getting paid millions to do something you wish you could do and that he should simply be greatfull for what he's getting.
It has nothing to do with "hating on a guy". BTW, do you think there is a value in a man keeping his word? Have you ever signed a contract of any kind? If so, did you keep your side of the bargain?
I don’t know why you are using the figure of $7M when he was guaranteed $17M. Do you understand that he would receive that money even if he sustained a career-ending injury in the first TC practice after the deal was signed? That’d be a bad deal for the team, right? Would you be OK with them breaching the contract and not paying the guaranteed money? See, that's the risk the team takes. If the player thinks he’ll be worth more money than a team is offering on a long term contract, he can ‘bet on himself’ and agree to a one- or two-year deal and then hit the open market. If he does that and sustains a career-altering injury he made a bad choice. The reason the players sign longer term deals with guaranteed money is it's insurance against getting badly injured. If he doesn't want that "insurance", he should sign a shorter term deal. If he’s worth what he thinks he deserves after the short-term contract he’ll get paid.
By signing a longer term deal, he received insurance in the event he got badly injured. Now he wants to change the terms of the deal. It would be like you going back to your home-owner insurer and asking for some of your premium back because you didn't have a claim over the past few years.