Think so and it sounds a lot like what we heard about the Rams Defense 12th man in Denver though, may make their D a bit tougher on AR.
Does anyone think the altitude and thin air might make a difference as well?
Think so and it sounds a lot like what we heard about the Rams Defense 12th man in Denver though, may make their D a bit tougher on AR.
Does anyone think the altitude and thin air might make a difference as well?
Think so and it sounds a lot like what we heard about the Rams Defense 12th man in Denver though, may make their D a bit tougher on AR.
Sorry, I have been told that in order to be legit, you have to have a winning record. Unless you are the Seahawks. The Rams don't as of this moment.Rams are legit..
Sorry, I have been told that in order to be legit, you have to have a winning record. Unless you are the Seahawks. The Rams don't as of this moment.
Hopefully a smart coaching staff keeps some records (stats ) on which players seem to be affected more or less by these geographical changes.
The coaching staff decided to fly into Denver today (one day earlier than most road games) so the players get acclimated to the altitude.
The coaching staff decided to fly into Denver today (one day earlier than most road games) so the players get acclimated to the altitude.
A night isn't going to help within the body. It might help psychologically though.
I haven't watched a Broncos game yet, but the television pundits have said that one of Mannings biggest problems is that with such a bad OL, he hasn't had the space to step into his throws. Since he's always had mediocre arm strength it's really affecting his throws to not have space. I don't see the Packers having a problem continuing that trend. If they don't apply pressure then Manning has the chance to do well. In his new offensive system, he doesn't have the cohesion with his WRs to make quick adjustments at the line as well as Rivers was able to do.
Manning has never really been a QB with great olines. He's in a new offense and doesn't know where to go with the ball. His arm strength is an easy cop-out for analysts to talk about when they're feeling lazy and don't wanna remember that Manning's arm has been weak for three years (Brady doesn't have a great arm anymore but that doesn't seem to affect him too much). Manning is just playing really badly, he's making a ton of mistakes.
Watching Brady and Manning this year, their arms don't compare at all to me. Brady's is much better.
24-20 Denver. Manning bounces back and has his best game of the year before sinking back into mediocrity for the rest of the season. Denver defense stuffs the Packer run game with Lacy continuing to show his ineffectiveness, and Rodgers can't find enough guys open and holds onto the ball too long too often.
Wow, what a Negative Nancy I am!
OK..
27-24 Packers. Same scenario except that Rodgers finally breaks free from Denver's pass rush for a couple of big plays in the final drive of the game and finds Richard Rodgers in the end zone with 00:35 left on the clock for the game winner.
I actually agreed more with your first paragraph. That doesn't make you a negativeNancy. Not everyone in here wears rose colored Packer shades....were not going to win every single game .
http://www.espnwisconsin.com/common/page.php?feed=2&id=22671&is_corp=1By night’s end, one team’s record will no longer be perfect. There are arguments to be made for each side – and the one that is most intriguing is the talk that Kubiak and Broncos quarterback Peyton Manning have reached an armistice on how the offense will be run and Manning will get to do “his thing” a little more than he has so far this season. That could be bad news for the Packers, who are still trying to get their own offense going and can’t be certain about their defense at this point. At the very least, it’s a great measuring-stick game for Green Bay. At best, it’d be a big win over a true quality opponent. We shall see what happens. Broncos 28, Packers 24.(Season record: 6-0.)
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/pack...s-for-broncos-game-b99604934z1-339140491.htmlThe depth is so great that cornerbacks coach Joe Whitt said he strongly considered playing another rookie, LaDarius Gunter, in a significant role against the San Diego Chargers the week before the bye. "I was scared to do it," Whitt said. "I knew he would probably match up well against those receivers, and I didn't do it. "So that's on me, because I have to do what I think is right. I didn't do it. I get paid pretty good money to make those decisions, but I didn't get it done. I kick myself for that."