SoonerPack
Cheesehead
Do we STILL have a critical need at a position? Yes.Did the CBs get better with Randall leaving, nope. Do we now have a critical need at the position? Yes.
Fixed.
Do we STILL have a critical need at a position? Yes.Did the CBs get better with Randall leaving, nope. Do we now have a critical need at the position? Yes.
this is 3D chest match. Gute doesnt like the value of the edge rusher a 14. Gute going to trade back to Buffalos 20 21 pick. and grab davenport and the best CB available.
I think Dantes makes some good points. Also, I have a feeling that this move isn't in isolation; something else is in the works.
Do we STILL have a critical need at a position? Yes.
Fixed.
Do we STILL have a critical need at a position? Yes.
Fixed.
I can't believe that after last year that anyone expects us to get anywhere with a backup quarterback.
I would have called CB a position of need before Randall was traded, but now that position group is the biggest hole on the team. Move over pass rusher, have to rely on Matthews and Perry for the foreseeable future.
Get out of here with that logic nonsense! We just traded away a pro bowler. Did you not get the memo??There is GOING to be a FA signing at CB... we aren't going into the season with what we currently have and rookie additions... It will just depend on whom we can bring in. Randall was on the shorter side, clashed with our coaches, quit on his teammates, and outside of the last half of the season was closing being cut than being a starter. He was one year away from asking for 8-9M/yr... he was never going to be worth that. I'd rather bring in a veteran like Johnson, Butler, Gaines, or similar while we draft one as well in the early rounds.
We needed a major overhaul on the defensive side and to be perfectly honest... most of us wanted a FA CB and high draft pick chosen... which would have had Randall being a short term prospect for us. King is our future #1 currently... now we need that #2 and #3 added for Pettine to succeed.
One stick. Pre-chewed.A whole pack?
We were still in contention when Rodgers came back and we had the worst QB play in the league while he was gone. If Kizer progresses and makes good on some of that talent, he could keep the team in better stead should Rodgers miss a span again. That way a 4-6 game injury doesn’t have to mean another year of Rodgers’ greatness down the tubes.
The Rodgers-less Packers won three games with absolute trash at quarterback. What do they do with average play? Win five? Make the playoffs? Who knows what’s next. The idea that no QB can win with this roster other than Rodgers is stupid.
A win is a win in the NFL.I wouldn't get too carried away with the 3 wins without Rodgers. They were against other crap teams; they needed a review to backfire on the Bears, won in overtime vs the Bucs, who were outplaying them most of the day, and had to rally from 14 down in the 4th qtr to beat the Browns-the Browns- in overtime. Color me unimpressed.
So he’s at a minimum he’s trade bait in 3 yearsthis is the part that bothers me the most
if Rodgers were a couple years older, this would be a trade i'd be excited about
Kizer still has potential to be a good quarterback
but Rodgers is going to outplay Kizer's rookie deal and if Kizer has developed, he be gone
Demarious Randall was a pro bowler because of some easy picks he made. He was far from a shut down corner.Get out of here with that logic nonsense! We just traded away a pro bowler. Did you not get the memo??
Demarious Randall was a pro bowler because of some easy picks he made. He was far from a shut down corner.
Did you watch any of Kizer last year? Total trash and he choked in the 4th quarter at Notre Dame several times. Not sure what the love affair is with him. I just don't see it.
Now we have King(who is still developing with shoulder concerns) and a bunch of scrubs at corner. This is maddening at the moment.
.
I wouldn't get too carried away with the 3 wins without Rodgers. They were against other crap teams; they needed a review to backfire on the Bears, won in overtime vs the Bucs, who were outplaying them most of the day, and had to rally from 14 down in the 4th qtr to beat the Browns-the Browns- in overtime. Color me unimpressed.
So he’s at a minimum he’s trade bait in 3 years
Yes— it was unimpressive. Which was largely because they were dealing with the worst QB play in the league over that stretch. I’m not saying that the rest of the roster last year was great. But they were better than that.
Take the Saints game as an example. The Packers score a TD on a drive in which the running game and a penalty account for every yard. Then the defense turns Brees over twice. They were up 14-0. They lost because Hundley turned in a 12/25 for 87 line with a pick. That’s beyond horrendous. The rest of the team played well enough to beat one of the NFC’s best. Their backup QB wasn’t up to doing his part.
It was a joke, bro .Demarious Randall was a pro bowler because of some easy picks he made. He was far from a shut down corner.