PackAttack12
R-E-L-A-X
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 6,500
- Reaction score
- 2,157
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
And off we go!!!
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
And off we go!!!
I was hoping 6.5M/ Year but maybe $8M kept him from looking elsewhere.
Unless I'm mistaken, as a released veteran Kirksey won't count against the Packers in the compensatory formula.
Unless I'm mistaken, as a released veteran Kirksey won't count against the Packers in the compensatory formula.
One aspect of this that makes sense to me is that while he never performed up the standard I wanted to see, Martinez was and has been the cerebral center of the defense. He gets the calls in and gets everyone lined up.
So replacing him was not just about his role on any given play, but his role as the defense's leader. Kirksey knows this defense already, so it shouldn't be a stretch to ask him to step into that role.
Whoa. I didnt see this coming. And about 2x what I would have expected.
I hope it is contingent on being available, given his injury history.
Well, I'm not sure how good he is, but Mike Pettine should know exactly. I'm trusting Gute on this one, he has earned our trust and we should have the inside track on him.
I don't find the player surprising since he was in Green Bay for a visit last week. The money, however, is suprising. I would expect some meaningful per game roster bonunes, and a year two roster bonus payable at the start of the next league year. Two years doesn't leave much room for backloading so the two years should be flattish.Surprising!
I don't find the player surprising since he was in Green Bay for a visit last week. The money, however, is suprising. I would expect some meaningful per game roster bonunes, and a year two roster bonus payable at the start of the next league year. Two years doesn't leave much room for backloading so the two years should be flattish.
Honestly his energy and excitement.....think a Za'Darius lined up at ILB. This locker room is gonna love him.
Not a good selling point.When healthy this dude excels in coverage when compared to Blake, I'd argue he may not be the tackler Blake was but has shown more than . . .
Not a good selling point.
It's like saying . . .
This DT is less injured than Justin Harrell
That OT is a better blocker than Jason Spriggs
The CB who knows more about being a CB than Quentin Rollins
. . .
I would submit that was part of the problem, Stanford notwithstanding. He had the signal caller job taken away mid-year in 2017, passed around to Clinton-Dix then Burnett. If in his own play he often doesn't seem to know what he's looking at, lack of anticipation, you can't expect him to make solid defensive adjustments.Martinez was and has been the cerebral center of the defense.
Was a joke.You're reading vastly too much into the Martinez line. The dude does excel compared to Blake, but honestly is one of the top 5 or 8 ILBs in coverage available in FA honestly.
Also no....that is not like saying those comparisons you listed to fellas not in the league or barely clinging...Blake is the franchise tackle leader and set to make bank in the NFL...anyway you slice you took that one and ran into an entire different field for comparison.