Breaking Down the NFC North, 2024

Magooch

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 15, 2021
Messages
1,080
Reaction score
1,049
Well with Minnesota winning last night, now if my count's correct....we'd need for both Minnesota and Detroit to lose their next two...and then play each other to a tie. But then we'll take first in the division :p
 

Pkrjones

Cheesehead
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
4,158
Reaction score
2,028
Location
Northern IL
Worst case scenario (for me) is a Vikings/Chiefs Super Bowl.
I think it's a 5-way battle in the NFC, depending on who gets/stays hot. Ram's offense is back healthy, Philly is always dangerous, Tampa is getting hot, GB (of course, but need to overcome dumb challenges & time management), & Detroit if they can hang on long enough to get Hutch back.
I think if Buffalo's D can stop a few drives may have the fire-power to knock out KC in the AFC.
 

El Guapo

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
6,493
Reaction score
1,880
Location
Land 'O Lakes
I would put the Vikings in that group well before the Rams and Bucs. Philly seems like the top dog now. Luckily I feel that the Packers can beat any of these teams.

I'm not sure that we would match up well against the Bills in the Super Bowl, but I'm willing to try!
 

Thirteen Below

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
1,142
Reaction score
927
Some interesting things happening in the North these past couple of days.

That Detroit loss to the Bills was as impressive a loss as I remember ever having seen. The Bills racked up 560 total yards (369 in the air, almost 200 on the ground), and scored 48 points. Against most teams, that's a blow-out victory.

But the Lions refused to quit. They fought like wolverines every single snap. Goff threw 59 passes, for 494 yards and 5 TDs (QB rating 118), and came within a touchdown and one more possession of puling it out.

These guys are going to make you work your *** off every single second of every game. Thet believe they're going to win every game right up until the gun goes off. They're going to be a very tough "out" all the way through the layoffs.


I watched the Bears game last night. They look like they've given up to me. Or are firmly in the tank.
I was thinking that's really how bad they are, but I think they're giving up a bit too. I've watched most of their games this year. Half of their team has been there less than 4 years, which means they have never had one single day working under a competent head coach. They just have no idea what they're supposed to be doing differently; they've got no leadership. No sense that they're building towards some sort of improvement. A lot of the time, they're just going through the motions.

Unfortunately, though, that's not true of Caleb Williams. That kid has zero quit in him, and tons of talent. He's a fighter, and he wants to win. If they find him a competent coach, and he gets a year or two experience and a more capable supporting cast, that team is going to be trouble. The days of marking down both Chicago games every season as "W"s are over.
 

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
5,073
Reaction score
2,065
I think it's a 5-way battle in the NFC, depending on who gets/stays hot. Ram's offense is back healthy, Philly is always dangerous, Tampa is getting hot, GB (of course, but need to overcome dumb challenges & time management), & Detroit if they can hang on long enough to get Hutch back.
I think if Buffalo's D can stop a few drives may have the fire-power to knock out KC in the AFC.
So if we get in we may be going to LA or Tampa first. Playing in very good weather unless they get hit with unlikely January storms. We seem to play better in that. At least our offense does. A lot can still happen in 3 weeks.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,309
One thing that’s been encouraging to date is the Packers can play at 85%-90% of what I’d call their “reasonable ceiling” but still stay within 1 score. Reasonable meaning I do not expect mistake free, but limiting mistakes to Christmas levels

Instead we see more
6 golden flags
5 bad play calls calling
4 missed Redzone TD’s
3 untimely timeouts
2 unsportslike sportsman
and a Fumbing Partridge in a Pear tree
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,309
Just reviewing Vikings at Lambeau
The thing that was noticeable was Love was immobile. He took uncharacteristic Sack trying to bounce outside the pocket and he looked slow and fragile in his first game back. His throws didn’t have their usual velocity. They were high, they were low, they were behind and they were late. Total mixed bag likely from Rust and not having his legs underneath him. Also notable was he did get better as he warmed up, which makes me believe it was 60/40 rust/gimpy

On Offense we were missing Starters at TE and WR with Watson and Musgrave to injury. Plus both were lost early on. More importantly on Defense we were missing Starters at Safety and Cornerback. J’aire and Evan Williams were out. At Kicker we were doing a tryout. Narveson missed both FG from 37,49 0-2.

The issue I’m noticing with a “young” team is they seem to take longer to get cohesion than a more established team. A non cohesive team, led by a rusty QB that was gimpy and missing key starters on both sides. It’s a recipe for an accident.

The Packers had 4 Turnovers.
3 INT 1 Fumble. We were like a turnover machine.
 
Last edited:

rmontro

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
4,947
Reaction score
1,557
Just reviewing Vikings at Lambeau
The thing that was noticeable was Love was immobile. He took uncharacteristic Sack trying to bounce outside the pocket and he looked slow and fragile in his first game back. His throws didn’t have their usual velocity. They were high, they were low, they were behind and they were late. Total mixed bag likely from Rust and not having his legs underneath him.
Love has now had four straight games without an INT, and five straight games with a passer rating over 100. He's had two consecutive years now where he's had a slow start, followed by a strong finish. Last year it was because it was his first year as starter. This year it was because of injuries. As long as our run game is working, we can play with anyone.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,309
Love has now had four straight games without an INT, and five straight games with a passer rating over 100. He's had two consecutive years now where he's had a slow start, followed by a strong finish. Last year it was because it was his first year as starter. This year it was because of injuries. As long as our run game is working, we can play with anyone.
I try to be fair because some mistakes are self induced and some mistakes are forced by our opponent. I don’t want to underestimate MN. It was a little of both. I do believe the MN Defense is legit good. We’d know by now if they were not.

Over the last 5 contests the Packers are playing Top 5-7 area Defense. Allowing just 18.8 per game and that includes some Offenses that are Elite or were functioning smoothly to middling level such as SF49ers and Chicago. Everyone tried to convince us how “hot” Seattle, Miami were before we met them. None mentioned how we just stifled both of them. We all know Detroit is super legit on that #1 Offense.

If we can stay healthy and get Jaire back I think we can play competitive with anyone. Eagles included. They might be a smidge better but if we play with energy like at Seattle I think we can go toe to toe. Everyone talked about the Dallas Defense last season. Playing at home they hadn’t lost all season. GB was the Cowboys first Home loss. They were 8-0 when we came to town and they had just beat the Eagles Week 14 33-13
and Detroit in Week 17 score 20-19.
 
Last edited:

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
5,073
Reaction score
2,065
Just reviewing Vikings at Lambeau
The thing that was noticeable was Love was immobile. He took uncharacteristic Sack trying to bounce outside the pocket and he looked slow and fragile in his first game back. His throws didn’t have their usual velocity. They were high, they were low, they were behind and they were late. Total mixed bag likely from Rust and not having his legs underneath him. Also notable was he did get better as he warmed up, which makes me believe it was 60/40 rust/gimpy

On Offense we were missing Starters at TE and WR with Watson and Musgrave to injury. Plus both were lost early on. More importantly on Defense we were missing Starters at Safety and Cornerback. J’aire and Evan Williams were out. At Kicker we were doing a tryout. Narveson missed both FG from 37,49 0-2.

The issue I’m noticing with a “young” team is they seem to take longer to get cohesion than a more established team. A non cohesive team, led by a rusty QB that was gimpy and missing key starters on both sides. It’s a recipe for an accident.

The Packers had 4 Turnovers.
3 INT 1 Fumble. We were like a turnover machine.
After watching the Vikings front 7 manhandle the Bears we will still be very challenged. Our D will have to step up and force some Darnold mistakes that can keep us in it.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,309
Need to be watching
1. Minnesota
2. Washington


1A While Vikes are a clear favorite at Seattle it is a very important game. An upset changes our Seeding outlook. If we beat Saints at home we are 1 game behind Vikes (they own tiebreaker). However we still play them. Plus the Vikings go to Detroit to finish and we Host the Bears. This week sets up a potential opportunity of stealing that 5th Seed. Maybe even outside chance of hosting a NFC game against 6th or 7th seed either one gets hot.

2. A Washington loss tomorrow and us Beating Saints at home Monday night and we only need to win 1 of the last 2 to capture the 6th Seed.
 
Last edited:

milani

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 11, 2012
Messages
5,073
Reaction score
2,065
Need to be watching
1. Minnesota
2. Washington


1A While Vikes are a clear favorite at Seattle it is a very important game. An upset changes our Seeding outlook. If we beat Saints at home we are 1 game behind Vikes (they own tiebreaker). However we still play them. Plus the Vikings go to Detroit to finish and we Host the Bears. This week sets up a potential opportunity of stealing that 5th Seed. Maybe even outside chance of hosting a NFC game against 6th or 7th seed either one gets hot.

2. A Washington loss tomorrow and us Beating Saints at home Monday night and we only need to win 1 of the last 2 to capture the 6th Seed.
Seahawks need to win because of AZ and LA. Last week set them back.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,309
Seahawks need to win because of AZ and LA. Last week set them back.
Exactly.

Plus Geno said he’s feeling better so he gives them a chance. I didn’t realize he’s passing at a 70% rec rate incredible. Playing at home obviously helps. Those 3 West Teams all still play each other thankfully we Clean Swept them all. Arizona still plays LA and Seattle still plays LA. That Division is still wide open.

This Week could decide a lot. We could lock at minimum a bottom Wildcard spot with 11 Wins and that turns the NFC into a Playoff Sardine can.
6 more teams are still in play for 1 lonely Wildcard spot. We know 2 will eventually Win their Division, but that’ll leaves 4 teams fighting for 1 NFC Wildcard :eek:
 
Last edited:

Members online

Latest posts

Top