especially when you can ignore the ones that don’t.Yes, facts do tend to fit the narrative.
especially when you can ignore the ones that don’t.Yes, facts do tend to fit the narrative.
lol i guess i should read all the replies before i post my own lolEspecially when ignore the 90% that don’t fit LOL
I'M not suggesting they fire Gute. i'm saying a scenario where Hoody was hired that HE'D fire Gute as HE would be the gm.
Our SB winning team was LOADED with talent though
What I really don't understand is... how has MM not decided to use a similar SPREAD and no huddle approach as he did with that team?? With the current roster..
It's possible they let him stay an extra year even if we do miss the playoffs though. The Clinton-Dix trade suggests Gute is building for the future, and has at least one more year to go in a multi-year plan to fix Ted's mess.
What I really don't understand is... how has MM not decided to use a similar SPREAD and no huddle approach as he did with that team?? With the current roster..
Sometimes it would be more appropriate if people just responded with, " I really don't understand" and leave it at that.The 2010 team used a no huddle offense on only 0.7% of the offensive snaps. They're using it way more often this season at a rate of 9.9%.
So the 2015 draft was a disaster obviously...
Jake Ryan is "ok"
The 2014 class was fine with HaHa, Davante Adams, Linsley, Goodson(ok for depth)
The 2016 draft yielded Clark, Martinez, Lowry
Trevor Davis is a good return man and the OL depth, although not good was "something"
The 2017 draft I'm ok with as it yielded Kevin King, Josh Jones, Montravius Adams, Aaron Jones and Jamal Williams.
Other than 2015, and a lack of CONTRIBUTING FAs i see a coaching problem
Overall though, the level of team speed on this roster is probably better now than at any time since the Super Bowl victory.
AR has missed more than usual... but there have also been A LOT of drops
No, you're right. MM had nothing to do with the gameplan in 2014 against the Bills that cost the team homefield advantage in the playoffs; nor did MM have anything to do with the scared coaching he did against the Sea Chickens that same year; nor did he have anything to do with the offense falling off a cliff because Jordy got hurt. That was ALL talent.
Rodgers' misses (balls in the ground, over their heads, too behind/in-front, etc.) have been way more than normal.
Sometimes I wonder if Rodgers is not at his "normal" level due to him trying too hard to live up to his contract.
I won't give ya the red X here but I disagree with some of what you're saying. I don't think MVS is the future at WR.
QB: We're good at 1 and 2. If Rodgers AND Kizer go down we might be in trouble. At that point Randall Cobb is our backup.
That's also why I suggested in another post that we trade for OBJ, if he was available.
Rodgers thrown a slant to the wide open MVS, on the one yard line play, that safety could have been avoided.
Rodgers threw the most passes of his career and the team lost by less than a TD.
He had the game in his hands. Do you want to get 2 and a half yards in one play with the best player on the field against a defense in shambles, or try to go 80 yards with backup receivers? It was so instantly obvious to me that he should go for it. No one will ever convince me otherwise. It was gift wrapped for. him. We had the game stolen. He handed it back.
It doesn't make any sense to speculate about something that will definitely not happen.
uuummm...yes he was. defender was 5 yards off of him. change the play. if rams change throw it away. either way safety avoided.MVS wsn't wide open on that play.
It doesn't make any sense to speculate about something that will definitely not happen.
Not really, he had his back to him, he doesn't have eyes in the back of his head. They start that play immediately at the snap of the ball. Was the DB lined up there the entire time? or did he back off? and it's not as easy as "just throw it away". Just throw it away where? to the sideline? Doesn't work if nobody is there. That's intentional ground, which is still a safety in the endzone. and where do you throw it away in the middle of the field? You don't.uuummm...yes he was. defender was 5 yards off of him. change the play. if rams change throw it away. either way safety avoided.
https://twitter.com/NFL/status/1056662560311664641?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1056662560311664641&ref_url=https://247sports.com/nfl/green-bay-packers/Article/Packers-safety-Rams--123938809/
it's all about pre-snap read. my original point was what's happened to the slant?Not really, he had his back to him, he doesn't have eyes in the back of his head. They start that play immediately at the snap of the ball. Was the DB lined up there the entire time? or did he back off? and it's not as easy as "just throw it away". Just throw it away where? to the sideline? Doesn't work if nobody is there. That's intentional ground, which is still a safety in the endzone. and where do you throw it away in the middle of the field? You don't.
and if the Oline would have just blocked that play better, it seems Bulaga or someone didn't get the message, it could have easily been 1st and 10 at the 15 or 20, or even better. If you don't execute properly, the call doesn't matter
Simple answer: who cares
Yep. Bottom line is Bulaga missed it.If you don't execute properly, the call doesn't matter
This one didn't cut it out. Starts about 3 seconds before the snap. I only count 10 players per side so someone must be off the top of the screen.well, they cut the pre-snap read out of the video. The instant before it is snapped, it's already been read. and if the DB is stepping up immediately at the snap, there won't be room to complete that pass. and then there is nowhere to throw it away too. So now what?
YesWas the DB lined up there the entire time?
NOor did he back off?
that's pure speculation on your part.
lol...might as well shut sports sites down then. 90% of it is speculation about things.