And that wasn't my point from the beginning, you took what I was saying and changed the narrative just to take a contrarian stance. I simply said that Aaron Rodgers and 7-9 do not belong in the same sentence because he has not finished a season with a winning percentage below 62% since his first year as a starter.
I'm well aware of the 8-12 stretch you're alluding to. But it's not in Aaron Rodgers' DNA to finish a season below .500, as evidenced by his level of play elevating to possibly the best football he's played in his career in order to make certain that he didn't miss the playoffs when the team was sitting at 4-6.
I said Aaron Rodgers and 7-9 do not belong in the same sentence, and backed it up with his
finishing records by season. I made a claim, which was supported by an undisputed fact.