RRyder
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 1,782
- Reaction score
- 192
If the money was the same, every GM would and should take Peterson over Shields. I'm a Shields guy, you can check, I've supported the Packers re-signing him from the beginning. However,Peterson is just as good in man coverage, much bigger and Peterson is a game changing player on special teams.
I agree all the way. If the moneys even Peterson all day over Shields. I really like Shields but honestly Tramons been better this year imo. Not a knock on Shields but ive seen Tramon on enough #1s this year in man coverage to say they arent having Shields shadow the opposings number one wideout as much as they did even last year.
If the moneys even its Peterson over Shields hands down just for his playmaking ability...... That being said NO CB this side of Deon is worth 10+ mill a year unless its on a one year final piece of the puzzle type deal. Your almost allways better off spending that money on a DE, DT or LB that can cause havok and make the ENTIRE secondary look better