FrozenTakesInGB
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
- Messages
- 130
- Reaction score
- 24
Because I know you’ve been craving one since my last hit...
Eh, nevermind. Taunting me with info isnt going to get your desired effect. Twitter will break it soon enough. Probably Kendricks.
Hmmm, we already have a tall old guy. Not sure how much he has left. He has been available for a while without much interest.Let me have a little fun! Marcedes Lewis in for a visit.
Hmmm, we already have a tall old guy. Not sure how much he has left. He has been available for a while without much interest.
Let me have a little fun! Marcedes Lewis in for a visit.
What tall old guy?
He's not old. Most TEs of his caliber play at a high level well into their mid-thirties. He should have 4-6 good years left in him.Graham
How much would Lewis realistically cost us? I wouldn’t mind signing him up, however I’d rather see us get a LB with the limited cap space we still have considering the lack of depth we have at that department.
How much would Lewis realistically cost us? I wouldn’t mind signing him up, however I’d rather see us get a LB with the limited cap space we still have considering the lack of depth we have at that department.
Did I miss a rule change, do we get an extra guy in the red zone? Or were you talking about those crazy fans in Seattle?That would be an ideal 12 personnel redzone formation.
Did I miss a rule change, do we get an extra guy in the red zone? Or were you talking about those crazy fans in Seattle?
Did I miss a rule change, do we get an extra guy in the red zone? Or were you talking about those crazy fans in Seattle?
12 personnel means 1 running back, 2 tight ends.
Just as 11 personnel is one of each, 10 personnel is 1 back and 0 tight ends, 21 personnel would be two backs and 1 tight end, etc.