Jamin Davis (Former 1st Rounder) Picked Up - Discussion

Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,310
...But how would a PS signing in anyway shape or form cause a shutdown of talks (if there are any) in the coming FA after the season at CB or Edge/iDL?
PS is just a designation. A place marker if you will.

We are 6-2 and about to hit the toughest stretch on schedule with some substantial ? Marks, particularly on D. We should be going after 1 substantial upgrade.

I’ll not be happy if Detroit upgrades on D and we get left in the wake. I feel a little Kevin Greene boiling in my blood. Except my appeal is not to CM3, but rather Brian G.
 
Last edited:

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,915
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Madison, WI
I hope this signing doesn’t in any way, shape or form prohibit us from upgrading in FA at CB or Edge/DL. Thats really my only concern is that it becomes a potential distraction to getting a dominant player added to our D.
Other than that, this looks like at most a good depth piece with possible upside of grooming for ST and a low cost, low risk signing.

...But how would a PS signing in anyway shape or form cause a shutdown of talks (if there are any) in the coming FA after the season at CB or Edge/iDL?

Yeah, I don't think the PS signing of Davis changes anything that Gute may or may not do regarding in season trades, FA signings or plucking guys off of other teams Practice Squads.

Gute has proven that he is always looking to improve the roster, from bottom to top. He saw a guy in Davis, that was worth taking a chance on and signed him to the PS to replace a guy (Chris Davis Russell) that he must have determined had come as far as he would with the Packers.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,088
Reaction score
5,695
PS is just a designation. A place marker if you will.

We are 6-2 and about to hit the toughest stretch on schedule with some substantial ? Marks, particularly on D. We should be going after 1 substantial upgrade.

Another team can claim him at ANY time directly to their 53 active roster if they wanted...this move DID NOTHING to stop/stall anything move wise elsewhere unless Gute is the worst GM in the entire league.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,915
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Madison, WI
PS is just a designation. A place marker if you will.

We are 6-2 and about to hit the toughest stretch on schedule with some substantial ? Marks, particularly on D. We should be going after 1 substantial upgrade.

I’ll not be happy if Detroit upgrades on D and we get left in the wake. I feel a little Kevin Greene boiling in my blood. Except my appeal is not to CM3, but rather Brian G.
I think you need to have more confidence in what Gute does. I know people have been talking about trying to land some big name on the DL, LB or CB, but does a 6-2 team need to do that, just to do it? Will 1 guy make such a big difference that its worth mortgaging our 2025 draft and cap for him?

Considering what has happened to Love this season and the fact that I thought 2024 was still another year of development, I am super happy with being 6-2. Now if Gute can find a way to improve the roster for this season and beyond, without throwing a ton of the future assets away, I would be on board.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,310
Oh I absolutely trust Gute. Matter of fact I’ve defended him on multiple occasions over his tenure. That doesn’t mean I think he doesn’t make mistakes or become complacent like human nature deals all of us. I also absolutely want him bettering this Roster. For 2 reasons:

1. I think it probable we see a spike in production on Offense as the year progresses. Maybe not on the level of 2023, but an increase either way. Cleaner games, smoother Wins etc.

2. I think it’s probable we will have other players injured throughout the course of the season. We are already thinner at CB. We have a starting caliber TE, RB and Safety coming back likely after the Bye. (Musgrave, Lloyd, Williams)

3. Starting 6-2 is wonderful. However wonderful changes quickly when you let your guard down. There are lots of ways to bring good players aboard and restructure contracts to avoid “mortgaging our future”. Nobody needs to get crazy, we should press the throttle down some if an opportunity presents itself.
 
OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,088
Reaction score
5,695
Disagree on claim Musgrave and Lloyd are starting level guys. Musgrave will get for sure snaps more than Lloyd but he is second fiddle to Kraft in a big way.

Agree though as a whole those three back is big
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,310
Another team can claim him at ANY time directly to their 53 active roster if they wanted...this move DID NOTHING to stop/stall anything move wise elsewhere unless Gute is the worst GM in the entire league.
So saying I want the Packers to focus on an upgrade at a thin position makes Gute the worst GM? ok I think you’re getting way too defensive.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,310
Disagree on claim Musgrave and Lloyd are starting level guys. Musgrave will get for sure snaps more than Lloyd but he is second fiddle to Kraft in a big way.

Agree though as a whole those three back is big
I disagree. I think you’re underestimating them.

Just because Musgrave took a step back and Kraft has risen does not erase what we saw last season from Rookie Musgrave. If you go back and look he’s barely played this season and he was coming off an injury one game and injured in another. Then suited up but never played his last game before IR. Mark my words nobody has given up on Musgrave in 2024. This is a long season and I’m expecting 18-19 games minimum. We will be through 9 games after the Bye. Watch closely how he gets ramped IF he’s healthy.

Also the way RB’s are de-valued, a #88 selection is more substantial than you think. Many 3rd Round RB’s pop in their Rookie season or soon after. I consider getting RB2 snaps starting btw. It’s significant. We call it a 1-2 punch for a reason. Let’s not hang on technicalities here.
I fully expect Lloyd to work into the lineup. He’s much more talented than Emmanuel Wilson long term imo. I predict he’ll overtake RB2 by next season at latest. I’m not talking today, but we need to prime him and that happens with playing time. Possibly by playoffs if he gets back in? Absolutely a possibility .

This is also assuming no regulars miss any time. I think that’s presumptuous to act like that will happen also. Injuries are a natural part and we can look at the list grow or evolve week to week to believe it. Now, God Willing, we will have both in the mix without injury to anyone.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,088
Reaction score
5,695
So saying I want the Packers to focus on an upgrade at a thin position makes Gute the worst GM? ok I think you’re getting way too defensive.

No I was saying IF signing a PS player stops him in FA as you put it he’d be a moron.

It’s been confirmed by a lot of sources Gute has been in talks for CBs which I would embrace and I really want him to make Clowney a Packer
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
16,474
Reaction score
7,310
No I was saying IF signing a PS player stops him in FA as you put it he’d be a moron.

It’s been confirmed by a lot of sources Gute has been in talks for CBs which I would embrace and I really want him to make Clowney a Packer
With the way J’aire is getting fragile, we’d be wise to get a CB. As much as I wouldn’t mind another Pass Rusher, I think CB is the biggest need.
 

sschind

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
5,329
Reaction score
1,555
Yeah, I don't think the PS signing of Davis changes anything that Gute may or may not do regarding in season trades, FA signings or plucking guys off of other teams Practice Squads.

Gute has proven that he is always looking to improve the roster, from bottom to top. He saw a guy in Davis, that was worth taking a chance on and signed him to the PS to replace a guy (Chris Davis Russell) that he must have determined had come as far as he would with the Packers.
If anything the moves Gute makes seem to be designed to give him more options. This won't take away his ability sign another linebacker but if something or someone better at another position is suddenly available he will not feel pressed to make a certain move.

In addition these are the types of moves a good GM makes. Like you said improving the roster from top to bottom is his job and I think he's been pretty good at it. The practice squad and in fact the bottom of the 53 should be looked at is fairly fluid. Those guys should always be playing for their careers at least their jobs on their current team. That's not to say the upper level guys should get complacent obviously just that if you're on the practice squad your job is far from solid.
 

Thirteen Below

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
1,142
Reaction score
927
Is there any more word on this guy? I couldn't find anything on him at any Packers site; is he still around? I'm curious beecause I saw him play a lot of ball in Kentucky, and was wondering how he would turn out.

I liked watching him college, and hoped he'd do well... truly amazing athlete, seemed like a really nice, smart kid.
 
OP
OP
tynimiller

tynimiller

Cheesehead
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
15,088
Reaction score
5,695
Is there any more word on this guy? I couldn't find anything on him at any Packers site; is he still around? I'm curious beecause I saw him play a lot of ball in Kentucky, and was wondering how he would turn out.

I liked watching him college, and hoped he'd do well... truly amazing athlete, seemed like a really nice, smart kid.

He is on Vikings active now
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,915
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Madison, WI
He had a sack today
It's funny. I decided to check the score of the Viking-Falcon game and tuned it in. 20 seconds later, Jamin Davis got his sack. :eek: :mad:

I see he ended up getting 9 snaps on defense and 10 on special teams.

Always hurts a bit to lose a good player off your PS, but I guess we will have to wait to see if Davis really was much of a loss.
 

Krabs

I take offense to that sir.
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
1,066
It's funny. I decided to check the score of the Viking-Falcon game and tuned it in. 20 seconds later, Jamin Davis got his sack. :eek: :mad:

I see he ended up getting 9 snaps on defense and 10 on special teams.

Always hurts a bit to lose a good player off your PS, but I guess we will have to wait to see if Davis really was much of a loss.
I don't think he really was. If he couldn't beat out the guys on our defense then he isn't much of a player.
 

El Guapo

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
6,493
Reaction score
1,880
Location
Land 'O Lakes
I don't think he really was. If he couldn't beat out the guys on our defense then he isn't much of a player.
That's assuming our coaching staff correctly diagnosed his skills and were willing to play him. Sometimes there are politics, ego, and incompetence involved. Time will tell.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,915
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Madison, WI
Does anyone know if teams can still protect 4 players on their practice squad from being poached?

I was under the assumption that this protection rule that was enacted during COVID still existed, but now I am reading that it no longer exists.
 

Krabs

I take offense to that sir.
Joined
Nov 10, 2020
Messages
1,663
Reaction score
1,066
Does anyone know if teams can still protect 4 players on their practice squad from being poached?

I was under the assumption that this protection rule that was enacted during COVID still existed, but now I am reading that it no longer exists.
From everything I've read, teams can still protect four practice squad players each week. The NFL decided to keep the Covid rules in place permanently.

 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
33,915
Reaction score
9,105
Location
Madison, WI
From everything I've read, teams can still protect four practice squad players each week. The NFL decided to keep the Covid rules in place permanently.


That was my assumption as well, but then I see things like this....

"Poaching players: Teams can sign players off the practice squad of any other NFL team. That player must be added to the new team’s 53-man roster and be eligible for at least three games. COVID-era practice squad protections which enabled teams to designate four players each week who could not be signed by another team no longer exist."

 

Members online

Top