The weak run defense is really a surprise. They added Reed to the DL, added Walker as an ILB, the secondary is made up of smart, hard-hitting athletes.
It seems like more of a coaching failure than a talent failure. The Packers give up yards even when the other team telegraphs "run", like yesterday after a 3rd string QB came in. I don't understand where the problem(s) is, but it needs to be fixed. The other rankings are very good, I expected this to be at least a top 10 D. The run D needs fixing. Wish I knew the answer.
The red zone numbers are a little reassuring. Bend don't break. And the D hasn't given up a lot of points. You could take 14 away from the Pats if Lazard doesn't fall down and the refs do their jobs. But that's just wishing. It was an ugly game, but good teams find a way to win those.I agree that it’s mostly schematic only because I saw it with my novice eyes. On replay they would go into that Coaches All-22 angle and there would be 2 DL from Tackle to tackle from time to time. It’s like we sent an invitation to run!
The other odd thing is while we are 22nd in Rushing yards, you’ll notice we are 7th in Rushing TD and 9th in passing TD. That tells me our opponents thus far essentially successfully run down the field..
and then get relatively stymied as they get into scoring range. We are 7th in Redzone Defense
Best teams in the NFC are Eagles/Packers, and in the AFC Chiefs/Bills. Some will disagree, but that's kinda where we are at week 4. Not bad, not great, but winning.