Anybody else see all the crying over the "missed delay of game" call on the MVS TD? Apparently these people don't watch a lot of football games. It happens quite often where the clock actually hits 0 before the ball is snapped.
Probably the same people who thought that Cordelle Patterson was out of bounds before touching the ball. Or that the hit by Akiem Hicks was legal and the no call was the right call. Yadda, Yadda, Yadda.....win some, lose some. At the end of the day, the play clock had nothing to do with Rodgers throwing a perfect pass to the wide open MVS.
The refs watch the clock go to zero, then look at snap . That’s why it’s never really calledAnybody else see all the crying over the "missed delay of game" call on the MVS TD? Apparently these people don't watch a lot of football games. It happens quite often where the clock actually hits 0 before the ball is snapped.
that's about how it goes. they give them a tick after 00 to get the snap offThe refs watch the clock go to zero, then look at snap . That’s why it’s never really called
at least they is how it was explained to me a while back
On the Patterson play I thought he was probably in bounds and it looked like the official standing right there thought so to but they cut away so fast and never went back to his initial reaction. I can't fault the replay though, there is no way you can overturn that. But, or should I say butt, I think we may have gotten it back on the Kmet fumble. Again very close with no clear evidence either way. IMO those two plays show one of the ways replay is supposed to work. A very close call on the field and replay can't overturn it.
I mised the Hicks play itself and I don't think they showed a replay, if they did I missed that too, but caught what the announcers were saying about it. They said it could have been an ejectionable offense.
They also missed a pretty blatent flinch on the Bears guard on I think it was one of Trubisky's 4th down sneaks.
All in all I think the refs had a pretty good day.
Real time i was sure he was in bounds. Replay it was very close. I think his toes were still in bounds and his heel still in the air when he first touched it, but when they're that close it is what it is. can't be too sure of it one way or the other. Neither replay they showed for us was a great view. The one where it showed the feet the best, the hand was behind the ball and hard to tell when contact was made. Where you could see where he touched it, but then couldn't see the feet.On the Patterson play I thought he was probably in bounds and it looked like the official standing right there thought so to but they cut away so fast and never went back to his initial reaction. I can't fault the replay though, there is no way you can overturn that. But, or should I say butt, I think we may have gotten it back on the Kmet fumble. Again very close with no clear evidence either way. IMO those two plays show one of the ways replay is supposed to work. A very close call on the field and replay can't overturn it.
I mised the Hicks play itself and I don't think they showed a replay, if they did I missed that too, but caught what the announcers were saying about it. They said it could have been an ejectionable offense.
They also missed a pretty blatent flinch on the Bears guard on I think it was one of Trubisky's 4th down sneaks.
All in all I think the refs had a pretty good day.
I would not have objected too much if the fumble was overturned.Kmet fumble was the same thing, whatever was called was going to be upheld as far as I was concerned.
Told my buddy who is a huge bear fan it wasnt a fumbleI would not have objected too much if the fumble was overturned.
The fumble was the correct call. Kmet was on top of a defensive player when the ball came loose.