thequick12
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2014
- Messages
- 3,235
- Reaction score
- 620
Says the fan of a team who’s hoping for a third Hall of Fame quarterback in a row.
Not hoping...watching a 3rd fhof qb in a row
Says the fan of a team who’s hoping for a third Hall of Fame quarterback in a row.
You’re right. After 9 good games how could I not see Jordan is clearly special and destined for Canton in the future.
It was for sure a cheap shot. What I was doing was providing some context. If Ditka isn't such a jerk, very likely that cheap shot doesn't happenDon’t read into stuff Sanguine merely didn’t respond or say anything. When something is so clearly dirty, someone not saying such doesn’t mean they automatically think it is fine.
@Sanguine camper you for sure don’t defend that play?
Seriously?
**** with that sh it
Earse or your out
I won't put up with trolling
The dirty hit on McMahon was 40 years ago, but the support for the dirty hit is current.You guys are comparing McMahon?
That was nearly 40 years ago!
The NFL has changed dramatically. In the 70’-80’s you almost couldn’t watch a game without a dirty hit. We could go back an exchange arguments on that every week in the NFL.
It’s like comparing the 80’s to the 1940’s. Let’s get back on topic instead of detracting our entire fanbase. This is the exact reason Bears and Lions have been largely irrelevant since McMahon. You guys make excuses for losing and focus on 1/2 Century old distractions that have 0% to do with this thread.
As far as this general ongoing sentiment you seem to constantly support from @Calebs Revenge that somehow Packer fans should be “worried”?
Truth is, It should be Detroit and Chicago and Minneapolis once that Contract got inked. You guys picked a bad time to be relevant. Reminds me of our bad timing in 2020 when Brady popped into our picture.
The 2024 SPOILER ALERT! #10 is the real deal. Deal with it.
I kinda like sparring with him.Putting him on ignore? Wow that was easy
It also has nothing to do with this topic. Just start new thread calledThe dirty hit on McMahon was 40 years ago, but the support for the dirty hit is current.
No brah….i just contribute to the board more than others…..Just wondering. Is it Caleb's Revenge to slowly but surely take over each topic?
A mod just called me a chicken turd rotfl.Why avoid my request to bet
Chicken ****
Ok I’m missing something. Do you mind to repeat what exactly we would be betting on?A mod just called me a chicken turd rotfl.
I will re-read the post. Sometimes I honestly just skim them so I missed the part about a bet of some kind, but I’ll look into it and get back to you.
Please don't. Have someone in another forum, definitely a Packer fan, who will just never be proven wrong, and I'm saving space there, too. If one can score points on a troll, that's fine, but when they just keep moving the goalposts, forget it. Side point, perhaps, but where have you sparred with him and won (according to him, not the rest of us)?I kinda like sparring with him.
Don’t worry sweetheart this is just a little friendly preseason sparring.Please don't. Have someone in another forum, definitely a Packer fan, who will just never be proven wrong, and I'm saving space there, too. If one can score points on a troll, that's fine, but when they just keep moving the goalposts, forget it. Side point, perhaps, but where have you sparred with him and won (according to him, not the rest of us)?
Your qb will will win SB vs Jets this yearOk I’m missing something. Do you mind to repeat what exactly we would be betting on?
We're used to talking with knowledgeable football fans, who understand the way the game is played. And are realistic in their opinions. You probably don't have any way of understanding this, but overall this is a very well-informed group iof footnall fans here.I’ve come here bc I figured, like myself, y’all might be tired of arguing/debating with people that have the same blinders on that I do.
Hmmm.... yeah... maybe you're right... sort of like the example the Bears set for the whole league last season with DJ Moore.Case in point….everyone here convincing themselves that it’s better to have three or four average wide receivers than one really good number one receiver, bc one of the four will put up legit numbers.
"Contributing to the board more than others" is not the same as "contributing more to the board than others contribute." Quantity of posts and quality of posts are two entirely different things.No brah….i just contribute to the board more than others…..
Got you typing didn’t itWe're used to talking with knowledgeable football fans, who understand the way the game is played. And are realistic in their opinions. You probably don't have any way of understanding this, but overall this is a very well-informed group iof footnall fans here.
We're not trying to look through a "different set of blinders", we're trying to look past blinders of any sort.
Hmmm.... yeah... maybe you're right... sort of like the example the Bears set for the whole league last season with DJ Moore.
Wait a minute.... how exactly did that work out, again?
Oh - and as another example of your lack of objectuivity, we have a hell of a lot more rthan "3 or 4 average wide receivers". The fact that you're incapable of seeing that is really a bad look for you, because it puts you on the opposite side of the disccussion from 99% of the NFL world. Players, coaches, analysts, every knowledgeable fan - everyone sees how good these guys are. Our top 5, maybe even 6 WRs would be at least a #3 on most teams in the NFL, and some of them a solid #2. There's just no denying that, and if you don't see it, you don't know what you're looking at.
And that's not even mentioning the two young tight ends, who each ha an exceptional half-season.
"Contributing to the board more than others" is not the same as "contributing more to the board than others contribute." Quantity of posts and quality of posts are two entirely different things.
Oh…that.Your qb will will win SB vs Jets this year
That was your claim
Then you disrespect fans here for believing in Love when your qb hasn't had time change his nail polish yet
I haven’t won the first argument and in his mind he’s superior.. Side point, perhaps, but where have you sparred with him and won (according to him, not the rest of us)?
I have decent intel that in 2023 Jordan's camp did not desire to do anything of the sort. That shift of splitting a "5th year" money essentially and giving him some serious change a year early was a win/win and his camp was betting on him. I bet early in 2023 his agent and camp was likely mildly concerned if the gamble would pay off, but LORDY did it.
Not hoping...watching a 3rd fhof qb in a row
Has nothing to do with believe and everything to do with talent. There are easily a dozen teams in the NFL with more talent than the Bears. When the Bears did win their lone SB 40 nearly years ago, they had the best talent by far in the league on defense and had a good o line with a HOF RB. In the modern NFL, the combination of a HOF QB, coach and TE seems quite unbeatable. Last time I checked, the Bears were a very far cry from that standard.Oh…that.
Could it happen? Yes.
It is a possible outcome.
Is a likely outcome…..no.
It would literally take the best season a rookie quarterback has ever had.
Now the Bears deserve it, but that doesn’t make it anymore likely.
If I didn’t make it clear, my dream scenario would be to beat you guys in the NFC championship game at Lambeau and then beat Aaron Rodgers and the Jets in the Super Bowl. The Cubs won in 2016 and if this were to somehow happen…. I’m ready Lord.
And don’t say it can’t happen bc my Cubbies came back from down 3-1. Anything is possible if you BELIEVE!!!!
I think a FAR more probable scenario is that the Packers end any Playoff hopes for Chicago either Wildcard Weekend OR several weeks earlier,we send Chicago off to watch the Postseason from home.If I didn’t make it clear, my dream scenario would be to beat you guys in the NFC championship game at Lambeau and then beat Aaron Rodgers and the Jets in the Super Bowl.
I would absolutely hate the hype over a Packers Jets SB. If that were to happen I'd probably take a two week vacation and lock myself in a room.I think a FAR more probable scenario is that the Packers end any Playoff hopes for Chicago either Wildcard Weekend OR several weeks earlier,we send Chicago off to watch the Postseason from home.
Then GB goes on to setup up a
LOVE VS RODGERS Super Bowl
The next best scenario is a
REPEAT OF SUPERBOWL I
I think the NFL would highly prefer either over Bears vs Jets
It would be on the level of Marino vs Montana meeting at the Pepsi machine.I would absolutely hate the hype over a Packers Jets SB. If that were to happen I'd probably take a two week vacation and lock myself in a room.
You are right though, the NFL would love it.
Darkness retreat for you, too?I would absolutely hate the hype over a Packers Jets SB. If that were to happen I'd probably take a two week vacation and lock myself in a room.
You are right though, the NFL would love it.
I'm afraid of the dark so I'd definitely leave the lights on but no outside news would get in.Darkness retreat for you, too?