Pack93z
You retired too? .... Not me. I'm in my prime
Why is it final just because Favre has retired? Is there a law about not reversing things roster wise? And don't give me "it's not fair to Rodgers" crap. It is abusiness and the objective is to win. Put the best players on the field that you can acquire. that would be Favre unless Mannign or Brady become available.
Trip.. I agree that the objective is to win the superbowl every year.. and that you should do everything in your power to put the best player in the position that you can.. but there lies the crux of the issue.. that is not the style of the Packers right now.
Do I want Brett playing next year in the Green and Gold.. yes I do. But he has been indecisive for how many years.. and to be honest, I thought he handled it right every year.. took his time, thought it through and made a decision.. I respected that approach and thought it was entirely correct way to handle it.
This year.. albeit the time frame was condensed a little more, but he decided that it was time to walk away.. he was spent and felt it was time. That put the Packers in a position of dealing with his departure. Now in a way they still are in the position of playing will he or won't he game. Favre is holding that open with his comments, the media is not helping either. To me, it is more than lining someone up behind the center.. it is a mindset and chemistry of a team that this will effect the most.
I look at it this way.. if he comes back it opens up drama that you don't see often in sports and like it or not, how it is dealt with from the GM's perspective will more than likely alter his career.. that is unless the Packers win the Superbowl and Rodgers has his shot in Green Bay at somepoint... otherwise.. it will always be seconded guessed so to speak.
IMO.. if Favre had any doubts about retiring, he should have left the question open like in years past.. on the flip side, if TT or MM forced him to make the decision at that time.. well then shame on them.