The better question to ask is: "Where would the Packers be today if TT had not been hired? That is, if you all want to play the "what if" games.
Here's one. "What if" the Packers don't fail to stop Philly on 4&26?
They advance but how far? It's conceivable they win the SB that year with Ahman Green as SB MVP and Sherman as coach.
Do they then hold on to Green longer than they did and how does that affect how the draft and build?
Sherman 100% gets extra rope before he's yanked out if the GM job so we miss out on bringing on TT as GM.
With Sherman as GM and Favre still under center we no longer draft Rodgers as Sherman would've never rocked the boat with Favre.
So simply by playing the "what if" game based on one single play years ago we no longer have Rodgers QBing our team for the forseable future and our entire outlooks different and it's possible we're every bit as good as the Browns.
This is just an example of the butterfly effect and how one simple action effects the entire future of the franchise. But hey TT isn't GM and Sherman loved free agency so everyone should be happy
Actually hell. This seems more fun than the actuall topic