Training camp 2017 notes and observations.

PackAttack12

R-E-L-A-X
Joined
Sep 16, 2016
Messages
6,500
Reaction score
2,157
Quite the opposite actually. In 9 seasons he's only missed 9 games, and 2 of them were due to a concussion iirc..played in all 16 games 6 out of 9 seasons. He's been able to play through his dings and keep himself in the lineup.
Yeah, that's why I cannot for the life of me understand some of the skepticism at the tight end position in comparison to last year. I like Cook, but we're way better off now than before.
 
D

Deleted member 6794

Guest
You'd like to think so since it would save wear and tear on Burnett not to mention the need for that experience on the back end with a bunch of young corners. However, it remains to be seen.

ILB is a difficult position to play especially when you're an undersized hybrid. Burnett brought a lot of accumulated football knowledge and refined instincts to the job. You could see the play recognition. The emphasis has to be on read and react rather than working off blocks.

Jones is going to have to internalize a difficult scheme and limit mistakes without having his athleticism dulled, i.e., thinking his way through plays, without the benefit of much college experience at the position.

That's why they play the preseason games. I'm look forward to seeing if he's up to the challenge.

Unlike a lot of other posters I don't expect Jones to have a huge impact during his rookie season, mostly receiving playing time on obvious passing down only.

You provided a lot of conclusions regarding "grasped the playbook" and "have an impact" that were not at all present in the most recent post, which referenced the blog reports of beat reporters' eyewitness commentary, podcasts, and the HC. It looks like a strawman of your own creation to justify intruding into a subject matter that you have recently claimed to have no interest. Is it that difficult for you to leave your ego at the forum door once in a while?

Here's what's truly getting old: It's that annoying obsession to pontificate to other posters regarding nearly every subject of interest to them and also to get-in the last word, just as you've attempted to do once again with the Janis reference in this thread. But this particular attempt goes well beyond merely stating your opinion because it appears to be a transparent attempt to censor others from discussing a subject that you don't want being discussed at all. Speaking for myself this forum does not revolve around you and your opinions, likes and dislikes. It's not your place to decide what others can or can't discuss.

If a subject truly doesn't interest you then you might want to try extending a little common courtesy to fellow posters by staying clear of the subject matter altogether instead of trying to suppress their participation in any such discussions.

It's truly amazing how many whiny wimps have frequented this fine forum within the past few weeks, leading to a point when members are being offended by a poster mentioning that he's not interested in talking about a specific topic. :rolleyes:

That's especially baffling considering the player being talked about has created a significant higher amount of pages on this forum over the past three plus years than regular season and playoff catches combined.
 
OP
OP
Poppa San

Poppa San

* Team Owner *
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Aug 29, 2010
Messages
13,319
Reaction score
3,160
Location
20 miles from Lambeau
PEOPLE, POSTERS and other attendees. Let us return this forum to a civil discussion of football and leave the personal slights in the quiver. I come here to get away from the jabs, barbs, and other push your button behavior.
 

Sky King

158.3
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
2,817
Reaction score
331
Location
Out of the clear blue western skies...
Unlike a lot of other posters I don't expect Jones to have a huge impact during his rookie season, mostly receiving playing time on obvious passing down only.



It's truly amazing how many whiny wimps have frequented this fine forum within the past few weeks, leading to a point when members are being offended by a poster mentioning that he's not interested in talking about a specific topic. :rolleyes:

That's especially baffling considering the player being talked about has created a significant higher amount of pages on this forum over the past three plus years than regular season and playoff catches combined.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
Bleh...even when Rollins was healthy he looked pretty bad. I'm nervous everytime I see a pass thrown his way.
Considering he was one of the highest rated DBs as a rookie per an often cited player ranking website, I can see where you're coming from lol
 

thequick12

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
3,249
Reaction score
632
They traditionally have, but with maybe 4 rbs we keep plus our FB, rip, and the wr talent we seem to have, I would think this would be a good year to bring Bennett and kendricks plus an extra wr instead of a third te


they can and should keep 3 te 7 wr 5 rb 2 qb and 8 ol for a total of 25 offensive players. and since allison wont count until adter week one it should allow the packers a better shot at sneaking one of those 8 wr onto the practice squad.
 

thequick12

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
3,249
Reaction score
632
Considering he was one of the highest rated DBs as a rookie per an often cited player ranking website, I can see where you're coming from lol

i expect rollins and randall both to have around 5 picks apiece this season
 

PackFan2

Cheesehead
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
735
Reaction score
69
Aaron Jones didn't really impress me. He looks like out of shape? I felt Devante Mays did a better job than Jones this training camp
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,748
Reaction score
2,034
they can and should keep 3 te 7 wr 5 rb 2 qb and 8 ol for a total of 25 offensive players. and since allison wont count until adter week one it should allow the packers a better shot at sneaking one of those 8 wr onto the practice squad.
Really? You as a forum poster have concluded that your opinion on roster formation is the absolute truth? I didn't realize it was so cut and dried prior to any games being played.
 

rodell330

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
5,611
Reaction score
495
Location
Canton, Ohio
Considering he was one of the highest rated DBs as a rookie per an often cited player ranking website, I can see where you're coming from lol

Forget his rookie season. The guy was covering #3 sometimes #4 WRs. When he was thrusted into a bigger role Where he covered 1's and 2's he got worked. Plain and simple.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
34,178
Reaction score
9,295
Location
Madison, WI
Forget his rookie season. The guy was covering #3 sometimes #4 WRs. When he was thrusted into a bigger role Where he covered 1's and 2's he got worked. Plain and simple.

Great Point! This is similar to when a #3 or #4 WR is expected to step up and be your #1 or #2. They are then most likely facing a better player on defense. That didn't go so well for the Packers in 2015 when Jordy was injured, James Jones led all WR's with 890 yards.
 

rodell330

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
5,611
Reaction score
495
Location
Canton, Ohio
Great Point! This is similar to when a #3 or #4 WR is expected to step up and be your #1 or #2. They are then most likely facing a better player on defense. That didn't go so well for the Packers in 2015 when Jordy was injured, James Jones led all WR's with 890 yards.

Exactly. People are quick to bring up his rookie season leaving out those facts. It'd be different if he came in as a rookie playing a key role as a 1 or #2 cb, and had that season. Then I'd be a little more patient with him.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
34,178
Reaction score
9,295
Location
Madison, WI
Exactly. People are quick to bring up his rookie season leaving out those facts. It'd be different if he came in as a rookie playing a key role as a 1 or #2 cb, and had that season. Then I'd be a little more patient with him.

Yup and the Packers will have to look at Adams in the same light next year, is he a #1 WR if and when Jordy retires? I am guessing the Packers will only offer him #2-3 type money, while some teams will probably offer him a lot more.
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,748
Reaction score
2,034
Yup and the Packers will have to look at Adams in the same light next year, is he a #1 WR if and when Jordy retires? I am guessing the Packers will only offer him #2-3 type money, while some teams will probably offer him a lot more.
Not sure about that. Adams is about a year ahead of Nelson's career track. I think it remains to be seen if he can perform like a typical #1 receiver.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
Forget his rookie season. The guy was covering #3 sometimes #4 WRs. When he was thrusted into a bigger role Where he covered 1's and 2's he got worked. Plain and simple.
why forget it? he played it, he did well in it. It doesn't fit your narrative? Let's just use the season he was hurt in pretty much all of it. A season where it was obvious to almost anyone watching he did not look the same physically as he did the year before and use that as the benchmark? I'm not going to argue that he had a decent season last year because it was pretty bad. But then he did not look the same physically from one year to the next to me. Same as Adams the year before and BahkT the year before that. Come back healthy, gain their physicality and amazingly enough, their play elevated right along with it.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
Great Point! This is similar to when a #3 or #4 WR is expected to step up and be your #1 or #2. They are then most likely facing a better player on defense. That didn't go so well for the Packers in 2015 when Jordy was injured, James Jones led all WR's with 890 yards.
and let's forget the offensive line was a constant rotation till about week 9. Let's forget that Adam's looked completely different physically the entire year. You watch his rookie season, you watch the next and then you watch last year and tell me that's the same ****ing player LOL. His first step off the line in years 1 and 3 look completely different than the year you reference. Was it because he sucked? or he was hurt? BahkT had ankle surgery as soon as the season ended and looked to take a step back that year IMO, I was skeptical of the contract they gave him, and keeping the injury in mind said he could still earn it, he has thus far. Let's also ignore in 2015 that Cobb had a bad shoulder almost all year long too. I think both those guys stepped in pretty well for the loss of Jordy last year in that Giants game. SO much was going on 15 more than just losing Jordy.
 

Pokerbrat2000

Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
34,178
Reaction score
9,295
Location
Madison, WI
and let's forget the offensive line was a constant rotation till about week 9. Let's forget that Adam's looked completely different physically the entire year. You watch his rookie season, you watch the next and then you watch last year and tell me that's the same ******* player LOL. His first step off the line in years 1 and 3 look completely different than the year you reference. Was it because he sucked? or he was hurt? BahkT had ankle surgery as soon as the season ended and looked to take a step back that year IMO, I was skeptical of the contract they gave him, and keeping the injury in mind said he could still earn it, he has thus far. Let's also ignore in 2015 that Cobb had a bad shoulder almost all year long too. I think both those guys stepped in pretty well for the loss of Jordy last year in that Giants game. SO much was going on 15 more than just losing Jordy.

Not sure what you just went off on, besides that I mentioned the correlation of a #3 or #4 CB being asked to be a #1 or #2 as being similar to the WR position? Didn't mean to rehash the 2015 season because of it. ;)

I don't doubt that guys have made the step up from being low man to high man on the totem pole. That is what happens all the time and what is expected to happen. What I was stating was to expect and rely on it to be successful every time is not realistic, especially when you are saying "The guy played great his rookie year, what happened?" and forget that the guy was playing in an easier role as a #3 CB or #3 WR and is now being asked to step up into a more difficult role. Yes, injuries play a part in performance, but as far as the CB position goes, do you think TT signs House and uses his first draft pick on King, if he is convinced that the poor play last year was just due to injuries?
 

easyk83

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
280
why forget it? he played it, he did well in it. It doesn't fit your narrative? Let's just use the season he was hurt in pretty much all of it. A season where it was obvious to almost anyone watching he did not look the same physically as he did the year before and use that as the benchmark? I'm not going to argue that he had a decent season last year because it was pretty bad. But then he did not look the same physically from one year to the next to me. Same as Adams the year before and BahkT the year before that. Come back healthy, gain their physicality and amazingly enough, their play elevated right along with it.

As a rookie Randall was often playing against number 2 receivers so call that bit about number 3 and 4 receivers a rodellism.
 

easyk83

Cheesehead
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
2,783
Reaction score
280
Not sure what you just went off on, besides that I mentioned the correlation of a #3 or #4 CB being asked to be a #1 or #2 as being similar to the WR position? Didn't mean to rehash the 2015 season because of it. ;)

I don't doubt that guys have made the step up from being low man to high man on the totem pole. That is what happens all the time and what is expected to happen. What I was stating was to expect and rely on it to be successful every time is not realistic, especially when you are saying "The guy played great his rookie year, what happened?" and forget that the guy was playing in an easier role as a #3 CB or #3 WR and is now being asked to step up into a more difficult role. Yes, injuries play a part in performance, but as far as the CB position goes, do you think TT signs House and uses his first draft pick on King, if he is convinced that the poor play last year was just due to injuries?

I dont think that Thompson was in a position to gamble on injuries. Rollins has struggled with injuries in both years in the NFL and Randall during his second. Even if one of them turns into a player you're still looking as only having 2 viable starters a long term flier in Hawkins and then a try hard no upside guy in Gunter and that's with the signing of House who also might not be a usable long term answer.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
Not sure what you just went off on, besides that I mentioned the correlation of a #3 or #4 CB being asked to be a #1 or #2 as being similar to the WR position? Didn't mean to rehash the 2015 season because of it. ;)

I don't doubt that guys have made the step up from being low man to high man on the totem pole. That is what happens all the time and what is expected to happen. What I was stating was to expect and rely on it to be successful every time is not realistic, especially when you are saying "The guy played great his rookie year, what happened?" and forget that the guy was playing in an easier role as a #3 CB or #3 WR and is now being asked to step up into a more difficult role. Yes, injuries play a part in performance, but as far as the CB position goes, do you think TT signs House and uses his first draft pick on King, if he is convinced that the poor play last year was just due to injuries?
Sorry for the rehash, I should have just said there were 20 other variables that season besides Jordy. But I guess you meant to imply that nobody could step in and fill his shoes, wen in reality I think we had guys good enough as has been proven before and since that season, they just weren't healthy enough.

If Rollins and Randall looked the same to you physically from year one and two, I can see where you're coming from. They didn't to me.

As to the 2nd question about bringing in House and a draft pick? Absolutely. It's a passing league and even if Randall and Rollins were great last year, we'd be going into the season with them and Gunter and guys who should be role players. Heck, Gunter should only be a role player with help around him. With Shields and Hyde leaving, more secondary was needed. Maybe Jones and king aren't picked in Round2, but high DB picks would not have been surprising.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
357
Reaction score
19
they can and should keep 3 te 7 wr 5 rb 2 qb and 8 ol for a total of 25 offensive players. and since allison wont count until adter week one it should allow the packers a better shot at sneaking one of those 8 wr onto the practice squad.
I like those numbers and your reasoning. My only adjustment, and it would be dependent upon performances in the upcoming preseason games, would be for 4 RBs and 9 OL, as I love the developmental guys we have there, and think that they are more likely to get poached than a 5th rb who is also a rookie.
 
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
357
Reaction score
19
Really? You as a forum poster have concluded that your opinion on roster formation is the absolute truth? I didn't realize it was so cut and dried prior to any games being played.
Good point, what are any of us even doing here?

GUYS, ITS OKAY, WE CAN STOP TALKING ABOUT FOOTBALL NOW! GUYS?
 
Top