Actually re reading it a bit your first post pretty much implies Thompson goes out an interviews coaches to fill the staff. That is not the case. McCarthy interviews the coaches and chooses his own staff. Thompson doesn't choose it for him. So credit Thompson with the McCarthy hire but credit McCarthy with guys on the coaching staff.
Whichever way, I think its fairly clear that TT is involved with the coaching moves that the team makes, whether simply as a stamp of approval, or as a sounding board to the HC or even in a more active capacity.
Perhaps had this thread been titled "Packers coaching moves" we might have had less debate but then what's the forum for if not debate? :wink:
Anyway I think the team's coaching moves last year could justifiably have been said to have raised some eyebrows and at times defied logic. For a team as young as the Packers, for a team in the midst of a rebuilding process as the Packers and for a team that has been a victim of its own coaching/GM mistakes you would expect that the team would look for stability and experience from its coaching staff and look not to make the same mistake twice (Schottenheimer). The fact that the coaching roster has seen significant churn, key positions such as the HC, OC, DC and now Asst. HC have all been people with no prior experience at that position is either a function of inexperience in assembling a winning coaching staff or part of a plan that rewards youth and potential over experience and proven capability.