You ever say anything and regret?
I have never said anything that I ever regretted saying.
Oh crap, I wish I hadn't said that.
I wonder if losing Dillon hurt us more than we realize? We HAVE to find a better #2 WR than MVS or Lazard.
That was kind of the key to it for me. I love Jones but we need Dillon and his power. I think if Dillon doesn't go out we gain a few more first downs and win the game. I agree on the #2 WR thing too even though MVS is a great WR.
as if the Pack didn't come to play? The 9ers' have as good of front 7 in football as you'll find. most teams getting pressured like that all night end up getting their ***** kicked, the field was long and the yards tough. Points were hard to come by but they were able to get some things going.
it was a tough game on BOTH sides. people don't think GB came to play? They matched their intensity throughout. Field position, Tackles and special teams were the difference. Well, special teams were the difference. End of story. Even with the rest, this team came to play and should have won.
its no coincidence Shanahan said this was a game where they felt they had the advantage on special teams.
Yeah, MLF sucked. He had 3 weeks to prepare for this game. It is a damning statement on his competence to have 3 weeks to prepare for this moment and look this unprepared and get outcoached in a playoff game again.
Matt is starting to look like a modern day Marty Schottenheimer.
how did he have three weeks to prepare for a team he didn't know he was going to play until last week?
Funny/Sad thing too about that final FG, the 10 Packers out there seemed to assume they couldn't block it, even with the season on the line. Compare their effort with the 49'ers effort when they blocked a non-game winning attempted field goal. Pathetic coaching of those special teams units is all I can draw from that.
"Hey I counted 10 guys, oh hell, it won't matter anyway, we never could block a FG?"
2 blocked FGs in one game are exceedingly rare. They had history against em'
Many have pointed out the ongoing issue with the Packer offense. They run into a team with a really good front 7, one that can stuff the run and put consistent pressure on Rodgers. What happens? Rodgers tends to go to the only receiver on the team that is worth much, Davante Adams. Lazard was the only other WR with a catch last night, 1 for 6 yards. While Jimmy G didn't light up the Packers secondary, he actually was able to spread the ball around and find open guys when he needed to.
I used to blame TT for not addressing the WR and TE positions, now it is on Gute. He has had plenty of time to fix it through the draft or free agency and has failed to this point.
So yes, Rodgers should be spreading the ball around, but honestly, I don't think he has enough talent outside of Adams to do that.
How long have you and I been agreeing on this? Since Jennings left probably, and its gone steadily down hill. To play devils advocate however why invest in a player your QB won't throw to anyway?
Yes and no. While I agree that Lazard isn't really an NFL starter on most NFL teams.
Randall Cobb, Lewis, and ESB were playing last night. Eventually enough is enough and AR just has to be able to find other guys when he NEEDS to.
Should there be more talent at the WR position? Hell yeah, I would have luved Fuller on this team last year.
But it's not like we didn't have Cobb, Lewis or ESB last night...
I though ESB was cut
just trying to lighten the mood.
.
In New England, outside of the Moss/Welker era and now Gronk, who did Tom Brady have????
Thanks
Nobody knows who they were but Tom still threw them a
shit ton of passes
In other words, the 49'ers have a coach that works hard at trying to find the weaknesses of the other teams ST's units? Their ST coordinator must have raised the table he was sitting at 4-6" or so when he started watching Drayton's units on film.
was he the neighbor you spoke of in your post in the thread where you talked about watching **** until you neighbors put up drapes.
Maybe this offseason we should focus on getting a receiving corps that's better top to bottom through the draft and free agency if we do find some way to keep Rodgers and most of the current roster intact?
I am not sure if just letting Adams and 1 or 2 other main players leave (along with most of the current receivers) would solve our cap problems this year though, plus some of the money would have to be spent on the new receivers.
I would only say we should do this if we are not looking at a major rebuild and/or Rodgers stays.
they would have a tough time building a better WR corps from top to bottom if they let Adams leave but since Lazard is the only WR currently under contract for 2022 (I think) we may get to find out.
EQ wasn't open at any point in that play until the ball was long gone. he was running thru a zone, not a target at that point and running right to a a defender. The only time he comes open the ball is gone. yes Lazard comes open, as Rodgers is winding up to toss a 40+ yard ball in frigid temps. I don't see how any one says EQ was open if they have any idea what route he's running in the concept of that play.
its easy to pick out wide open guys once the play is committed to. The defenders probably saw it too.
Do you see the ball in the air? Rodgers already threw the ball and when he did, Lazard had just made his break.
Doesn't Rodgers have the ball on a string so he can pull it back. I think the Globetrotters used to do that and they won all the time.
Captain is going to have a field day with this one. If he doesn't have a stroke that is.