...what comes right before "amicable"?It doesn't say imminent parting. It says amicable parting.
...what comes right before "amicable"?It doesn't say imminent parting. It says amicable parting.
You’d think so.If Rodgers goes to the Jets, doesn't that mean he'll be playing for the Vikings next year?
I milk almondsI milked a cat once.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
So why is he meeting with J-E-T-S jets jets jets if he doesn't want to be traded?I think they wanna move on personally. I think if they trade him then Rodgers decides what he wants to do at that point. I don’t think he retires. All I know is that he has informed them he intends to return. And thats 100 percent a fact I just dunno why the front office has said that yet.
I think that because he's open to the idea the Jets are talking up how close they are to contending & that they have a 2 year window if he's onboard. I don't think they want any part of this if he can't/won't give a 2 year commitment.So why is he meeting with J-E-T-S jets jets jets if he doesn't want to be traded?
Snoops said he doesn't wanted to be traded.I think that because he's open to the idea the Jets are talking up how close they are to contending & that they have a 2 year window if he's onboard. I don't think they want any part of this if he can't/won't give a 2 year commitment.
Who do you trust more, LTF?Snoops said he doesn't wanted to be traded.
Do you know why they call it almond milk?I milk almonds
and his commitment is good until the next nourishing mystery hits LolI think that because he's open to the idea the Jets are talking up how close they are to contending & that they have a 2 year window if he's onboard. I don't think they want any part of this if he can't/won't give a 2 year commitment.
They clearly wanna move onSo why is he meeting with J-E-T-S jets jets jets if he doesn't want to be traded?
yep. Can certainly be both. Rodgers has said a number of times now he’d prefer to retire a Packer but also that it just might not work out that way and the team might want to move on. Was he lying when he said that? I don’t think so.Wanting to be traded and being open to it as being a possibility if he wants to keep playing or to have a situation be the best it can be for all involved are two different things.
Yep. As others have mentioned, GB would have to give their consent to speak with Rodgers in the first place, and from what I can tell it sounds like in most circumstances a team would only do that if they already more or less had some rough framework agreed with the Jets (i.e. if GB and the Jets are miles apart on compensation, they're not gonna go ahead and let them convince Rodgers and hurt GB's bargaining position). But what I haven't seen said much....while it's technically true that Rodgers doesn't have a no-trade clause - at least not one that's formally written into his contract - practically speaking he does have one as he can simply threaten retirement and nix any deal he's not interested in. With that in mind I have to think that the Jets have already received some sort of signal from Rodgers and/or Rodgers' camp that he would be willing to entertain a deal; just like if GB and NYJ were miles apart GB wouldn't consent to allowing NYJ to talk to Rodgers - if Rodgers was absolutely uninterested in joining the Jets he would likely not bother meeting with them in any capacity.At this point, I have a hard time seeing Rodgers remaining a Packer. The Packers have obviously worked out some of the details with the Jets on a trade, the Jets went to visit Rodgers. How does that all get walked back and everyone in GB, including Rodgers himself, is happy with everything that just happened? I suppose if the Jets say "on second thought, pass", then the options dwindle. Hopefully, there are other teams still interested in Rodgers.
I've brought that up several times, as have a few other posters. Not having a No Trade Clause, is really moot point with Rodgers. Even if he bluffs and says "You trade me to the Browns and I will retire", the Browns aren't going to risk giving up a bunch of draft capital to see if he is bluffing or not.But what I haven't seen said much....while it's technically true that Rodgers doesn't have a no-trade clause - at least not one that's formally written into his contract - practically speaking he does have one as he can simply threaten retirement and nix any deal he's not interested in.
I'm sure I will get blasted for saying this, but I wouldn't put anything past Rodgers, when it comes to deception and games, it is in his DNA and he likes to win.Rodgers isn't at all interested in joining the Jets and is just using them as leverage for reasons unknown but that seems unlikely to me at this point.
Atlanta is more vein of Lamar trade IMO.
But I could also see the Jets approaching him as a veteran piece to keep along with Olave and Moore on a restructured extension.
I think they need to send us Olave and Moore in the trade and the Jets can sign Lazard, Cobb and Amari Rodgers.
According to several reports the Falcons aren't interested in pursuing Lamar.
It would be a heck of a job by Joe Douglas if he would be able to trade Olave to the Packers in exchange for Rodgers as he's currently under contract with the Saints.
So why is he meeting with J-E-T-S jets jets jets if he doesn't want to be traded?
That's probably the likely explanation, but not the only one. It's also possible GB wants to explore all its options and see what they would be able to get for Rodgers, and then make the decision from there.Because he wants to continue playing and the Packers FO has told him they want to move on to the Love era
That's probably the likely explanation, but not the only one. It's also possible GB wants to explore all its options and see what they would be able to get for Rodgers, and then make the decision from there.
If the rumors are true, Rodgers came back, wanting to play for the Packers. The Packers though have decided to move on. It wasn't Rodgers going to the Jets, it was the Jets going to Rodgers at his home.You really think Rodgers would go along with that so much so as to actually take time out of his life to go visit with the Jets?
Haha I wouldn't and I don't...theres no way
The two options are what I said above or that Rodgers is in fact the one who wants to countinue his career outside of GB. And he has requested a trade and been granted permission to speak with other teams as part pf that process