Pokerbrat2000
Opinions are like A-holes, we all have one.
Of course he can steer a trade and by saying "no i wont play for that team", he has not just steered it, but denied a trade. You stated this:That's what I said, all he can do if he doesn't like a trade is to retire. Sure, that means he can help steer where he is traded to (up to a point). But as I said before, I would guess that mutual respect would lead them to trade him to a place agreeable to him. If he wants to still play in GB, that's up to the front office as to whether that's what they want or not. He has some leverage, but so what? Whether they keep him, trade him, or if he retires, I'll live with it either way.
Rodgers doesn't really have the power to deny a trade
I was merely explaining that he does have the power. Also keep in mind, no team is going to trade for Rodgers if he doesn't want to play for them.
Let me ask you this. Scroll up to my 3 trade scenarios. If you were Rodgers, wouldn't you want to see your soon to be new team, giving up minimal draft capital for you? Since, the more that they give up, the less they can improve the team through the draft.
Rodgers is a very smart, calculating person. If he wants to still play for the Packers, but they say "thanks, but we've decided to trade you." Do you really think that will sit well internally with Rodgers and there will be a happy, simple parting of the ways?