Packers vs Bears Game Thread: Make the Bears Continue to Suck edition

[OldSchool101]

Jaire played only 10 snaps after reaggravating his knee injury in the 1st half... which was still 6 more snaps than Eric Stokes had. I think that speaks volumes about the long term employment of #21 in Green Bay after this season.

I’d really like to see us go after 2 CB’s for next year. Ideally a Day 1-2 draft selection + a good veteran FA

 

[PackerDNA]

I’d really like to see us go after 2 CB’s for next year. Ideally a Day 1-2 draft selection + a good veteran FA

I'd like to see us quit dikking around and beef up both lines so we can win the line of scrimmage to deal with some real contenders like the Lions eagles and 49ers

 

[OldSchool101]

I'd like to see us quit dikking around and beef up both lines so we can win the line of scrimmage to deal with some real contenders like the Lions eagles and 49ers

There will be some good quality DL in this draft. It might even be a position Gutey hunts down in FA after the Preston Smith loss. It often takes a iDL a year or two to pop (think Wyatt). Might be best to just reinforce DL with another know Veteran.

 

[Voyageur]

There will be some good quality DL in this draft. It might even be a position Gutey hunts down in FA after the Preston Smith loss. It often takes a iDL a year or two to pop (think Wyatt). Might be best to just reinforce DL with another know Veteran.

Early prognostications say there will be a run on defensive seven players in the first 3 rounds. It's going to be the biggest takes of that portion of the draft. If you want someone who has real talent, it will have to be very early, or you'll lose out.

 

[Thirteen Below]

Early prognostications say there will be a run on defensive seven players in the first 3 rounds. It's going to be the biggest takes of that portion of the draft. If you want someone who has real talent, it will have to be very early, or you'll lose out.

Sorry to be so jaded, but honestly... at this point, I'd be very nervous about Gute using a 1st round pick on a front 7 D, or any other D for that matter. I'm half-kidding here, so take this as just a wise-*** crack, but I almost wonder if he's better off taking a 1st round WR and trading him 2 years later for the DL or LB that someone else took in the 1st.

Again... not a serious suggestion... but not completely off the wall either.

 

[Voyageur]

Sorry to be so jaded, but honestly... at this point, I'd be very nervous about Gute using a 1st round pick on a front 7 D, or any other D for that matter. I'm half-kidding here, so take this as just a wise-*** crack, but I almost wonder if he's better off taking a 1st round WR and trading him 2 years later for the DL or LB that someone else took in the 1st.

Again... not a serious suggestion... but not completely off the wall either.

You could be right. We don't seem to have the acumen for getting the right guys for the defensive front seven for a while now. I wonder if part of the problem at this point is the switch to more base 4-3 v s 3-4? It's a major difference for so many players within that group that it's difficult figuring out how many actually fit the new scheme.

What I did see, against the Bears, late in the contest, was a pretty substantial pass rush, despite some wide open gaps where Williams exploited it. That, methinks, is more on the fact that the Packers did not use anyone from the LB crew to act as a spy. They played it more as if he was a pocket passer.

Then there was the two different Brendin Cox players we saw on the field. The one who worked to the backfield well, and held corners, and then the one who totally failed to hold the corner. It showed how raw he is, and at the same time, how much potential there is in him. I hope the talent end wins.

Regardless of what they think, or anyone else thinks, I believe they already miss Smith out there. We talked about his lack of production, but to be honest, I think that one of the reasons we saw that is that teams schemed away from him, looking at weaker spots on the field to exploit. But, that's just an opinion. I haven't watched any decent game film to make a judgement on it.The uptick as guys learn to play in his place will come. I hope it made a big jump in this game, because at this point, we're dog meat for the Vikings and Lions if it isn't there.

 

[chemist]

You could be right. We don't seem to have the acumen for getting the right guys for the defensive front seven for a while now. I wonder if part of the problem at this point is the switch to more base 4-3 v s 3-4? It's a major difference for so many players within that group that it's difficult figuring out how many actually fit the new scheme.

What I did see, against the Bears, late in the contest, was a pretty substantial pass rush, despite some wide open gaps where Williams exploited it. That, methinks, is more on the fact that the Packers did not use anyone from the LB crew to act as a spy. They played it more as if he was a pocket passer.

Then there was the two different Brendin Cox players we saw on the field. The one who worked to the backfield well, and held corners, and then the one who totally failed to hold the corner. It showed how raw he is, and at the same time, how much potential there is in him. I hope the talent end wins.

Regardless of what they think, or anyone else thinks, I believe they already miss Smith out there. We talked about his lack of production, but to be honest, I think that one of the reasons we saw that is that teams schemed away from him, looking at weaker spots on the field to exploit. But, that's just an opinion. I haven't watched any decent game film to make a judgement on it.The uptick as guys learn to play in his place will come. I hope it made a big jump in this game, because at this point, we're dog meat for the Vikings and Lions if it isn't there.

We are not playing up to our potential yet. We should be better than we were last year.
I’m looking for a key game that signals a turn around for us when it comes to playing a solid game. 49rs next week might be it if we win that game. 49rs appear to be going backwards but so did the bears and they almost beat us. It should not have been that close.

We need better overall game management decisions, meaning schemes and strategy that will allow the talent we have shine thru.
A solid winning effort vs 49rs is what I’m looking for.

 

[Voyageur]

We are not playing up to our potential yet. We should be better than we were last year.
I’m looking for a key game that signals a turn around for us when it comes to playing a solid game. 49rs next week might be it if we win that game. 49rs appear to be going backwards but so did the bears and they almost beat us. It should not have been that close.

We need better overall game management decisions, meaning schemes and strategy that will allow the talent we have shine thru.
A solid winning effort vs 49rs is what I’m looking for.

The 49ers game is going to be a big one for the Packers. We have a run of tough games inside the division coming up, and that makes it a tough schedule ending the season.

If we can get past the 49ers with a win, and without injuries, it would be a great help.

 

[chemist]

The 49ers game is going to be a big one for the Packers. We have a run of tough games inside the division coming up, and that makes it a tough schedule ending the season.

If we can get past the 49ers with a win, and without injuries, it would be a great help.

A good point about division games. Thats why we need the 49rs game to become a springboard for GB to manifest an attitude of confidence, discipline, along with good game time decisions. All of that starts at the top.

 

[OldSchool101]

You could be right. We don't seem to have the acumen for getting the right guys for the defensive front seven for a while now. I wonder if part of the problem at this point is the switch to more base 4-3 v s 3-4? It's a major difference for so many players within that group that it's difficult figuring out how many actually fit the new scheme.

What I did see, against the Bears, late in the contest, was a pretty substantial pass rush, despite some wide open gaps where Williams exploited it. That, methinks, is more on the fact that the Packers did not use anyone from the LB crew to act as a spy. They played it more as if he was a pocket passer.

Then there was the two different Brendin Cox players we saw on the field. The one who worked to the backfield well, and held corners, and then the one who totally failed to hold the corner. It showed how raw he is, and at the same time, how much potential there is in him. I hope the talent end wins.

Regardless of what they think, or anyone else thinks, I believe they already miss Smith out there. We talked about his lack of production, but to be honest, I think that one of the reasons we saw that is that teams schemed away from him, looking at weaker spots on the field to exploit. But, that's just an opinion. I haven't watched any decent game film to make a judgement on it.The uptick as guys learn to play in his place will come. I hope it made a big jump in this game, because at this point, we're dog meat for the Vikings and Lions if it isn't there.

One thing about Preston is while he did not always light up the stat board, he was a very well rounded player. He didn’t give up that Edge very often and I recall him running some players down for eventual losses, often it was someone else mopping up his blockade.

 

[OldSchool101]

DL is very hit or miss outside a Top 10 selection. BJ was good. Kenny was a good pick for a 20’s overal. Wyatt is more recently holding his own as a fringe Round 1/Rd2 pick. Call him break even. The issue is it often takes 2-3 years to get that production and we can’t wait around hoping on it. I think we should do what we did with the Smiths in FA (or McKinney) Go get 1 solid veteran player coming off a Rookie deal, but primed DL with some pocket collapsing prowess, but solid against the Run. We don’t need a $25mil a year guy. I’m talking more on up to that McKinney contract $$. 4X65m 4X69M $25m guaranteed type $$

 

[Krabs]

I know everyone's gonna go ahead and rub it in, but you guys aren't gonna do anything in the playoffs. Anyways you beat the worst team in the league arguably by a point so sleep on that.

This is just taking shots at everyone because you expected a win. You don't have to get all whiney about it. I slept perfectly fine. I would also so that the Packers are in a much better spot to have a playoff run than the bears. Realistically, the Packers are not good enough to make a Super Bowl run. One never knows though. Just get there and get hot at the right time.

You must be logged in to see this image or video!

 

[Magooch]

Think it's kind of revisionist history to call the Bears the worst team in the league too. Nobody was saying that heading into the game. Terrible offense, but a really solid defense. They're a botched Hail Mary and a blocked FG away from being the #6 seed in the NFC. I know they're not the end-all, be-all, but were there ANY "power rankings" that had the Bears as #32 last week? I seriously doubt it.