you misunderstand, I think people have been saying enema.I'm an enigma I tell ya.
you misunderstand, I think people have been saying enema.I'm an enigma I tell ya.
Imagine if Gute trades up in the first round and....grabs a QB. People would literally lose their sh*t.
Agreed and $6 mil????? I hope most of that is incentive-based.No, I understand that.
But I disagree that he's average outside of a couple of bad plays.
I think his baseline level of play is just poor. In 2019, he buoyed it towards average with a few good plays. In 2020, he tanked it towards disaster with a few bad ones. But strip away the outlier plays, and he's just a bad corner.
Now I get that there were financial constraints. I also understand that he was probably playing hurt last year (though that's part of the deal with King). But I was still hoping for a slightly better option at the position.
$6 mil still seems awfully rich for what they're getting back. I guess this gives them some freedom as to where in the draft they select a corner. Hopefully a rookie corner is mentored by Alexander and not King.......Exactly...a dude as young as him, if he was even average with trending upward projection that man gets a 9M a year contract MINIMUM IMO.
$6 mil still seems awfully rich for what they're getting back. I guess this gives them some freedom as to where in the draft they select a corner. Hopefully a rookie corner is mentored by Alexander and not King.......
Yeah it's like paying $6 mil to keep a bad influence around. If they had more cap space, they probably would have grabbed a guy like Breeland. That wouldn't be a huge upgrade, but certainly better than keeping King around. We'll get some idea of how King's contract is constructed whenever we get the latest cap analysis.I don't disagree, I'd not paid King more than $3M if any. I think was best to cut ties.
Anyone know where to find out up to date roster info? The places I normally go are pathetically slow in currency. Disgraceful actually.
Whats contract break down? What are incentives?$6 mil still seems awfully rich for what they're getting back. I guess this gives them some freedom as to where in the draft they select a corner. Hopefully a rookie corner is mentored by Alexander and not King.......
I don't think the contract details have been released yet, but yeah, hopefully it's long on incentives.Whats contract break down? What are incentives?
It isnt a straight 6 mill
Spotrac. This link to cap hits has King signed but no contract info in the chart yet.Anyone know where to find out up to date roster info? The places I normally go are pathetically slow in currency. Disgraceful actually.
Anyone know where to find out up to date roster info? The places I normally go are pathetically slow in currency. Disgraceful actually.
you misunderstand, I think people have been saying enema.
Any draft pick. Even a first round cb won't make 6 million next year. King was awful in the NFCCG and most of 2020. Not a good idea to reward bad performance. I would think other teams are going to shred him like TB. Lots of film showing the ways to do it.Name said alternatives?
Disagree that King had a rollercoaster year. He sucked the whole season and picked the NFCCG to go from bad to worse.This deal will be incentive based but he had such a roller coaster year last year.
Any draft pick. Even a first round cb won't make 6 million next year. King was awful in the NFCCG and most of 2020.
Like coaches, who is currently on the roster, jersey number, years in the league etc. some of the places I normally go aren’t updating the info.What specific info?
Yes, one would certainly think and hope so. Hence, my disgust.Honestly, the best places are the team websites themselves. I'd follow that up with spotrac for player info. For historical info that isn't super recent pro-football reference. I can't think of a website that specifically focuses on team coaches like the team websites do.
You understand that there's no guarantees in the Draft right? Depending on how you analyze the Draft, if you look at CBs drafted by the Packers in the last 10 years, we're shooting at roughly 30%; so to say that King could just so easily be replaced in the Draft is shaky at best.
While it's true the Packers success at drafting CBs had been shaky using that as an excuse to overpay to keep one of those shaky picks rather than try again makes no sense. Past performance does not guarantee future results.