tynimiller
Cheesehead
- Joined
- May 2, 2012
- Messages
- 14,940
- Reaction score
- 5,572
I agree on king, he should not have been resigned, especially with the other options available.
As for Rodgers...I think it's very clear after Mark Murphy's comments that it's not Rodgers but the Packers who are avoiding pushing money into the future on Rodgers contract. The team obviously is toeing the line when it comes to maintaining flexibility when it comes to moving on from Rodgers.
And I'm not really sure why? Surely they should feel comfortable moving forward with Rodgers as qb for the next 2 seasons. There's no doubt he provides the team a unique/rare opportunity to make a run at the super bowl
I am not too quick to read anything into Murphy's statement. There is not another organization that keeps internal discussions such as these very internal. There also is very few HOF level, high profile athletes like Rodgers that literally dated another high profile actress, kept that secret and announced that they'd been engaged for awhile with a slip of a tongue months later....
We are dealing with an organization and a player that prefer quiet vs speculative drama. Personally I think there is as much a likelihood of either option: extension/push is in the works or Green Bay is planning on moving on.