PackAttack12
R-E-L-A-X
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 6,500
- Reaction score
- 2,157
Maybe we'll see a Saban/Kiffin situation where Shanahan loses focus and is thinking too much about the Golden Gate Bridge.
Please for the love of god don't let that happen... lolMaybe we'll see a Saban/Kiffin situation where Shanahan loses focus and is thinking too much about the Golden Gate Bridge.
We will play nickel all game, cover 1. Your receivers struggle to get off of press coverage and we will stunt the Dline to flush Aaron to his left with beasley or Campbell spying. It's not going to be as easy as you seem to think it is. You got cobb and cooks ok you also lost Nelson who had 98 yard that game. Our defense is not complicated.Packers were missing Cook, Cobb and I think another offense player the 1st Atlanta game.
May score even more this time
Wow.We will play nickel all game, cover 1. Your receivers struggle to get off of press coverage and we will stunt the Dline to flush Aaron to his left with beasley or Campbell spying. It's not going to be as easy as you seem to think it is. You got cobb and cooks ok you also lost Nelson who had 98 yard that game. Our defense is not complicated.
Bank on cover 1 90% of the time with the Dline trying to flush Aaron to the left towards the spy.. if you don't believe me watch the 2nd half coaches film. We're gonna do our best to make Rodgers beat us straight up.
Why do you think dallas made a comeback and you didn't score 40? They went press and jammed you at the line.
I can tell your stubborn and don't want to talk real football though. Thanks to everyone else who has had a legit discussion
I discussed football and facts.. your right I'm a guest but if you can't handle a strong well thought out opinion maybe a message board isn't for you. All you did was drop some weak reason for assuming the packers will score more points. I simply refuted it and pointed out it was a weak reason. I've behaved well inside of your MB rules. So please enough with the threats of banning me.Wow.
Don't forget your a guest in this house of ours
Don't forget that Lacy and Shields were out then, too, on IR.holy ****, look at who did not play that game
http://prod.static.packers.clubs.nfl.com/assets/docs/gamebooks/2016/161030-gamebook-falcons.pdf
So because I don't have the football iq like you, your going to belittle me?I discussed football and facts.. your right I'm a guest but if you can't handle a strong well thought out opinion maybe a message board isn't for you. All you did was drop some weak reason for assuming the packers will score more points. I simply refuted it and pointed out it was a weak reason. I've behaved well inside of your MB rules. So please enough with the threats of banning me.
I'm discussing cover 1 and the difficulty your wrs have disengaging from it. Come on man..
I discussed football and facts.. your right I'm a guest but if you can't handle a strong well thought out opinion maybe a message board isn't for you. All you did was drop some weak reason for assuming the packers will score more points. I simply refuted it and pointed out it was a weak reason. I've behaved well inside of your MB rules. So please enough with the threats of banning me.
I'm discussing cover 1 and the difficulty your wrs have disengaging from it. Come on man..
Don't bring it upDon't forget that Lacy and Shields were out then, too, on IR.
Ummmm....aren't they both still out?Don't forget that Lacy and Shields were out then, too, on IR.
No threat here of a banning
You are banned
I won't play this game with visitors
When it was a new situation having Sheilds,/Randall/Rollins out, as well as Lacy/Starks/Montgomery out. Then figure in the receiving corps of Cobb, Cook, and again Montgomery, limiting Rodgers options with his running backs all out...Ummmm....aren't they both still out?
And your board called me illiterate? This is the 2nd post you had grammar issues.I
i did, and comparing defenses is pointless. We're not the Giants D and you sure as hell are not the Seattle D..
We bullied Seattle as well. But, I am worried we can't out score you.But we are a much different team too. Since the bye, our D has allowed 19 points per game average. And as many of the talking heads said after our game with Seattle, we bullied the bully, and our D was more physical than theirs. And the way Dallas came back on your D, I'm pretty sure you aren't going to contain our offense. We average 35 points a game at home, and 33.8 overall. Look at what we did to the best D left in the playoffs, Seattle. Gonna be a good game, but I'm optimistic about the Falcons' chances too
Atlantas O-line isn't what Dallas's was. Dallas's oline was dang good, and powerful. Now atlantas Oline is ranked high, but they aren't powerful. I think their numbers have been padded a bit by the excellent RBs. Freeman and Coleman are like zeke. They can dominate... Ryan and the pass game is obviously very good too. The balance and the play calling is the falcons strength. But I think the Oline could be over powered by Daniels/Guion and our trio of great pass rushing LBs. Giving Ryan and the RBs more trouble than they are used to.Falcons fan had a lot of good points. After Dallas started jamming receivers at the line, coverage got very tight and incompletions went up. As the game went on, Dallas' receivers got more space while Packer receivers were more often covered. Packers are going to have to use more roll outs and bootlegs to beat the tight man to man coverage. Another way to beat that coverage is for the WR to go deep opening up the underneath for the TE or qb scrammble. MM will have to have the best play calling game that he's had in a long time. I have no clue how Capers can limit the Falcons passing game. The inside stunts where CM3 rushed up the center gap generated more pressure than his outside rush. I think the pass rush sceme will need to be Einstein smart or it could get ugly.
Just watched the game again. The incompletions went up when the Dullass defenders realized the refs weren't going to flag defensive holding calls as long as they weren't tackling the receivers in their routes.Falcons fan had a lot of good points. After Dallas started jamming receivers at the line, coverage got very tight and incompletions went up. As the game went on, Dallas' receivers got more space while Packer receivers were more often covered. Packers are going to have to use more roll outs and bootlegs to beat the tight man to man coverage. Another way to beat that coverage is for the WR to go deep opening up the underneath for the TE or qb scrammble. MM will have to have the best play calling game that he's had in a long time. I have no clue how Capers can limit the Falcons passing game. The inside stunts where CM3 rushed up the center gap generated more pressure than his outside rush. I think the pass rush sceme will need to be Einstein smart or it could get ugly.
It's actually the opposite. Free and Cole are ballin but a ton of it is scheme success. Very good zone blocking system lead by Alex Mack. Our O-line is a huge part of our success.Atlantas O-line isn't what Dallas's was. Dallas's oline was dang good, and powerful. Now atlantas Oline is ranked high, but they aren't powerful. I think their numbers have been padded a bit by the excellent RBs. Freeman and Coleman are like zeke. They can dominate... Ryan and the pass game is obviously very good too. The balance and the play calling is the falcons strength. But I think the Oline could be over powered by Daniels/Guion and our trio of great pass rushing LBs. Giving Ryan and the RBs more trouble than they are used to.
Just watched the game again. The incompletions went up when the Dullass defenders realized the refs weren't going to flag defensive holding calls as long as they weren't tackling the receivers in their routes.