JK64
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2014
- Messages
- 1,088
- Reaction score
- 272
Fire Pettine now!
WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR, LEFLUER? FIRE PETTINE NOW!!!!!!!!FIRE PETTINE NOW!!!
WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG, LEFLUER? FIRE PETTINE NOW!!!!WHAT ARE YOU WAITING FOR, LEFLUER? FIRE PETTINE NOW!!!!!!!!
Yes Pettine hasn't been great all year, we've been an average defense for the most part being carried by an elite offense
HOWEVER, the fault needs to fall at the feet of Gute as well. We've continually threw draft capital at DB's and left glaring holes all throughout the defense and this past year WASTED 3 picks to begin the year on positions that could have added some talent
WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG, LEFLUER? FIRE PETTINE NOW!!!!
MLF shouldn't need his permission. He is in charge of the coaching staff. He can bring in whomever he wants.MLF needs to get Murphy's permission to fire Pettine.
I have zero confidence in Pettine, especially to come up with a great game plan for a specific opponent.Then again, I have zero confidence in his players to execute it even if he did.
Dan Quinn for DC!Fire Pettine now!
If it does, this team is in serious trouble.I wonder if the fire Pettine thread will last as long as the long standing Fire Capers thread.
I wonder if the fire Pettine thread will last as long as the long standing Fire Capers thread.
Dan Quinn for DC!
Mehhh, I thought about him, but I'm starting to think his previous success at the University of Florida and Seattle was just due to having a huge swath of incredibly talented players. Seeing him struggle for years on end with that Atlanta defense is a big deterrent for me.
I could probably think of a handful of coaches possibly to be fired that could come in as new DCs, but I think we also need to look beyond the retread market. Someone's gotta be more creative with the defense while also not being too complex.
I've been checking Packers.com every five minutes. They haven't fired him yet!WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG, LEFLUER? FIRE PETTINE NOW!!!!
A set up similar to and yet different than what we saw with Dom Capers.
We lined up with 4 Corners and 2 Safety's and just 1 Linebacker (Blake Martinez) most of game. Seems the plan was to force Bears to run the ball more. Not sure if this will be standard set up or just to exploit pass errors from a young QB or just because we did not have a speedy linebacker with Burks out...but it worked. Probably not as effective as it should have been given Clay's inept performance means we pressured Mitch less than we would have preferred.
vs Vikings:
With a pass catching RB like Dalvin Cook, we'd get beat badly if we ended up with just 1 linebacker. Add in Murray to the mix, I reckon we probably should see Antonio Morrison more.
And Vikings have a better WR set than Bears, which makes it more complex to defend against.
A quick linebacker who can drop into coverage will be sorely missed, imo.
Some good articles if anyone is interested:
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-bay-rolls-with-3-wrs-and-6-dbs-all-game-long
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...id-injuries-puts-clamps-on-bears-passing-game