gonzozab
Cheesehead
I heard on the news the other day it might happen next year against the Rams. I hope not.
How about on deck chairs sailing over on the Titanic. Oh, wait, Rodgers will be back playing by then.If they do...can there be an Aaron/Clay commercial where Clay dressed as an old housewife asks Aaron "Might I be *****?" and politely pours his tea?
I heard on the news the other day it might happen next year against the Rams. I hope not.
The Rams are most likely winning their division and are on the rise, but the NFL usually schedules London games with the home team being one that normally doesn't draw good attendance numbers, which applies to the Rams. That's why you see the Jaguars play there every year.It would have to be an non-divisional away game to a non prime-time opponent. Rules out a bunch of possible opponents.
Could be Eagles as they have also not played in London, but if they win SB then maybe not...
That's why you see the Jaguars play there every year.
IDK but it does bring up some important questions.. for instance:
If the Jets played there and lost.. would they blame it on “Jet Lag”?
Why the heck are they playing games over there anyway? It's not like Manchester United is coming here to play games. Not that many people would show for it.
Why the heck are they playing games over there anyway? It's not like Manchester United is coming here to play games. Not that many people would show for it.
I agree with you, they shouldn't play NFL games over here. But a few people showed up last time Man United played a friendly in the states:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...-front-of-record-American-football-crowd.html
2 hours is a big difference from halfway across the world.I don't see why giving up one home game for London would be all that bad. Packers use to play half their home games two hours away.
Why not ?? You`ve never been to a wembley game ?