rdawsoniii
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2011
- Messages
- 66
- Reaction score
- 6
I’ll bet $1000.So no bet?
Talk a big game, now we know how you roll
I’ll bet $1000.So no bet?
Talk a big game, now we know how you roll
after his "bend don't break" defense let Tampa score in the final seconds of the first half, Capers had to go. My god, that alone was unforgivable in my book.
Lmao!I’ll bet $1000.
I’ll bet $1000.
So the remainder of Rodgers' career is likely tied to Joe Barry. Let's hope he surprises us.
he's got a point though
Look at Scotland, pubs have been closed for a year because of covid and we qualify for our first major tournament since 1998, and beat englandshire at Twickenham for the first time since 1983
28 is yards..scoring was middle of the bunchSo why not Quinn? Richard? Why someone who has never had a D ranked higher than 28th? Makes zero sense.
So why not Quinn? Richard? Why someone who has never had a D ranked higher than 28th? Makes zero sense.
So why not Quinn? Richard? Why someone who has never had a D ranked higher than 28th? Makes zero sense.
Well as to why not those two names in particular, that Seattle Cover 1/Cover 3 defense has largely been figured out and exposed around the league. It isn't even working that well in Seattle any more. Hiring someone to install a system that's on the down slope would have been a questionable move.
The reason that Barry was hired, I suspect, is to bring the system from LA/Denver/Pre-2020 Chicago to Green Bay.
If Gary takes another step we could have the horses to make that sort of pressure oriented defense(Denver) work. I could see Z and Gary fulfilling the roles of DeMarcus Ware and Von Miller.
If Gary takes another step we could have the horses to make that sort of pressure oriented defense(Denver) work. I could see Z and Gary fulfilling the roles of DeMarcus Ware and Von Miller.
If Gary takes another step we could have the horses to make that sort of pressure oriented defense(Denver) work. I could see Z and Gary fulfilling the roles of DeMarcus Ware and Von Miller.
Rodgers is playing until he's 49, got another 12 years or so
Didn't Preston Smith play for Barry? I don't think we have too many pass rushers.
Well as to why not those two names in particular, that Seattle Cover 1/Cover 3 defense has largely been figured out and exposed around the league. It isn't even working that well in Seattle any more. Hiring someone to install a system that's on the down slope would have been a questionable move.
The reason that Barry was hired, I suspect, is to bring the system from LA/Denver/Pre-2020 Chicago to Green Bay.
To think that LaFleur is more interested in hiring a buddy than hiring the guy he believes gives him the best chance to win... that he would bring Evero all the way to the finalists table and then choose someone he thinks less off...
I mean-- none of you or the people covering the Packers knew Evero's name a month ago, and now it's a scandal that he didn't get the job. What a farce.
People are getting really stupid over their disappointment with this hire.
They interviewed a bunch of people that they were interested in, and came away believing Barry was the best fit for what they want to do. How's that for a theory?
Okay, so then give me the more well reasoned argument based on what we know.
I fear the reason that Barry was hired was nepotism.
https://www.acmepackingcompany.com/...-example-of-the-nfls-rampant-nepotism-problem
Barry's career appears to be based mainly on friends and relatives giving him jobs; and now, another coach he worked with is giving him yet another shot.
Hopefully he's learned some things but this hire isn't exactly screaming "well reasoned".
Man that article said A LOT.
I had to take a break from the forum to compose myself.
I don't like Barry, don't want him, but we're stuck with him.
If they wanted a LB coach to make these guys better, my top guy Jerod Mayo was available. But maybe like some of you surmise, it's all about the Phillips/Fangio/Staley system that LaFleur wants. Fair enough. But Evero came from that same system, why not try him?
I know Barry was with Derrick Brooks in Tampa, but Derrick Brooks is Derrick Brooks, to say that Barry "made" him is laughable. I'll say the same about Ryan Kerrigan in Washington, who was already a household name before Barry got there. During his time at USC, he produced one draft selection in Malcolm Smith, who was the 242nd Overall Pick in the 2011 Draft, but you could almost completely credit that more to Pete Carroll, who coached Smith from 07-09 at USC.
Looking particularly at his stint in Washington, he took a "C-" defense and maybe made it a "C" after additions through the Draft and Free Agency, how that justifies him deserving another shot, I fail to understand.
I get that Barry has had time under some great DCs, I also get that players and coaches alike call him "energetic" and "passionate", but none of that is a guarantee for success. At the end of the day, Barry has to be able to coach and call the defense. He has to be able to elevate the level of play of these guys on the field. I have yet to hear a single credit to Barry in that light. He seems to me to be just a "team guy", a guy you might like to be around, a guy who makes you feel good....but that's about it. Being a good guy/friend doesn't mean a thing about being successful on the field.
Again, we're stuck with him. So all I can do is be hopeful that LaFleur knows what he's doing and not just hiring somebody because he's been coaching a while and he's his friend. Barry's hiring and subsequent performance will let me know if he's truly matured into being a HC or just being a really good OC.
The Packers 2020 DRankings:
Yds - 9th
Pass - 7th
Run - 13th
Pts - 15th
Sacks - 10th
Ints - 18th
The minimum Barry has to do is hold serve, but if those rankings drop, I'm calling for his job and for MLF to be reigned in by Murphy on staff hires.