Let´s just make sure to trade Love right after he wins his one and only Super Bowl, instead of holding onto him for another ~10 years.No clue, but I will be loving whomever our 4th straight FHOF QB is!
Let´s just make sure to trade Love right after he wins his one and only Super Bowl, instead of holding onto him for another ~10 years.No clue, but I will be loving whomever our 4th straight FHOF QB is!
One has to imagine that behind closed doors that the Jets offered Rodgers a lot of latitude when it comes to the offense. I agree that I think we see the worst in terms of Rodgers and doing whatever he wants when he wants. For example, the ole passing on running play calls that go flying by a WR with his hands help up after it zings by.
Now, don't get me wrong. I was on the side of keeping Rodgers due to him being our best shot at winning. However, now that the deal is over it does seem a recipe for disaster in New Jersey. Lazard is a gutsy player, but I still see him as a #3. My hope in all of this is Rodgers hits that 65% of plays mark and we get that coveted 1st round pick.
That is certainly possible, given that Robert Saleh is a defensive minded coach.One has to imagine that behind closed doors that the Jets offered Rodgers a lot of latitude when it comes to the offense. I agree that I think we see the worst in terms of Rodgers and doing whatever he wants when he wants.
One has to imagine that behind closed doors that the Jets offered Rodgers a lot of latitude when it comes to the offense. I agree that I think we see the worst in terms of Rodgers and doing whatever he wants when he wants.
One thing I will be interested to watch, is how Rodgers meshes with a completely new offense. A big knock most of his career in GB was that it took him time to establish chemistry with his receivers. This is his opportunity to squash that criticism. While he is familiar with Allen Lazard, he will have to connect with the rest of the Jets WR's, TE's, RB's, as well as his new offensive line. Couple that with a new playbook and HC, I expect growing pains and lots of Rodgers eye rolls along the way.
The only time Rodgers has been highly successful as an individual player over last 6 years or so has been when he has been cajoled into playing within the structure of LaFleur's offense. When LaFleur was hired, Rodgers either didn't embrace the offense or hadn't learned it well enough, or both, and the results were middling. Then they drafted Love, Rodgers leaned into LaFleur's scheme a lot more, and he won back to back MVP's. Last year, he pulled the offense back in the direction of his preferences, and he regressed.
Yup and this might be a way for him to "right that wrong" narrative or at least try and correct it, if it is true. Besides Lazard, these will all be new players to Rodgers and depending on what offense Hackett runs, that might be a bit of a learning curve for him too.Don't forget Aaron penchant for only throwing to receivers who run the correct routes and know the offense backward and forward.
While I tend to agree with your very entertaining post, I also think too many times in his career, Rodgers did play hero ball. How many times a season did he frustrate us when he seemed to give up short first down producing plays and throw a long incompletion, going for the home run ball. That said, you have to take the good with the bad and Rodgers most definitely gave us way more good on the field than bad.I dislike this argument. Not because it necessarily wrong, you could certain be right, BUT itt reads a little too much "Rodgers did a good, he must be following MLF's offense better," and conversely, "Rodgers did a bad, he must be going off-script and playing hero ball."
2019's middling results should have been predictable to general NFL fans. The Falcons and Matt Ryan showed us what would happen and it went almost too perfect. A long tenured veteran QB enters the Shanahan offense for the first time. Has a middling year one. Goes off and wins an MVP in year two. Such is the script for both Ryan and Rodgers.
I still place the majority of 2022 on the pass catchers rotting off. Yes, Rodgers a year older and with a broken thumb didn't help, but with new, poor-quality receivers, or both (looking at you Watkins) the pieces weren't there. They ran less motion, imo, because the receivers couldn't reliably do it properly. It doesn't just mean going in motion, I include whatever "stuff" they had to do as part of the play call.
In the interest of injecting the humor, I presume what happened on many plays is....
Rodgers breaks the huddle, a run play is called.
Team lines up.
Rodgers scans the defense.
"Aw crud, SS rolled into the box, FS is cheating up 3 yards. We do not have the numbers to block this. Check to the pass play." (NOTE: I consider this to be the correct decision.)
Ball is snapped.
Watkins decides to pick is nose, Rodgers looks elsewhere.
Doubs, being a 4th round rookie, loses at the release. Rodgers looks elsewhere.
Lazard blocks the cornerback in front of him.
Watson's hamstring gives Watson a wedgie. Hamstring dies. Twice.
Dillon or Jones perform yeoman's work blocking an extra rusher.
With few remaining options, Rodgers holds the ball because what else is he supposed to do?
I don't disagree with that, but in my head, that's a different category of criticism. I'm happy to admit I would grump at the TV when he he seemed to ignore an obvious open receiver.... I also think too many times in his career, Rodgers did play hero ball. How many times a season did he frustrate us when he seemed to give up short first down producing plays and throw a long incompletion, going for the home run ball.
Agreed. I spent enough time defending him over the years during some of those Monday morning, frame by frame, birds eye view analysis going around. Like I said, have to take the good with the bad and I still love what the guy could and did do on the field for the Packers.I don't disagree with that, but in my head, that's a different category of criticism. I'm happy to admit I would grump at the TV when he he seemed to ignore an obvious open receiver.
Watching Kurt Warner's analysis videos softened my opinion. IMHO, why he'd seeming make the wrong decision. Some of them are his fault, some are the fault of others, and sometimes, they just pay the other guys too.
If the receiver is open, but ran the wrong route, he's not open because he's not where the QB is looking for him.
If the receiver was an early read, was covered, and got open late, the QB has to be able to get back to him. If the blocking doesn't give him that much time or ran into safety help, he's not as open as he appears.
Sometimes he'd just miss the open guy.
There's no one reason, but not hitting the short-open guy doesn't mean "hero ball" to me. That could just be his version of Favre taking a shot and throwing a bad pick.
I dislike this argument. Not because it necessarily wrong, you could certain be right, BUT itt reads a little too much "Rodgers did a good, he must be following MLF's offense better," and conversely, "Rodgers did a bad, he must be going off-script and playing hero ball."
2019's middling results should have been predictable to general NFL fans. The Falcons and Matt Ryan showed us what would happen and it went almost too perfect. A long tenured veteran QB enters the Shanahan offense for the first time. Has a middling year one. Goes off and wins an MVP in year two. Such is the script for both Ryan and Rodgers.
I still place the majority of 2022 on the pass catchers rotting off. Yes, Rodgers a year older and with a broken thumb didn't help, but with new, poor-quality receivers, or both (looking at you Watkins) the pieces weren't there. They ran less motion, imo, because the receivers couldn't reliably do it properly. It doesn't just mean going in motion, I include whatever "stuff" they had to do as part of the play call.
In the interest of injecting the humor, I presume what happened on many plays is....
Rodgers breaks the huddle, a run play is called.
Team lines up.
Rodgers scans the defense.
"Aw crud, SS rolled into the box, FS is cheating up 3 yards. We do not have the numbers to block this. Check to the pass play." (NOTE: I consider this to be the correct decision.)
Ball is snapped.
Watkins decides to pick is nose, Rodgers looks elsewhere.
Doubs, being a 4th round rookie, loses at the release. Rodgers looks elsewhere.
Lazard blocks the cornerback in front of him.
Watson's hamstring gives Watson a wedgie. Hamstring dies. Twice.
Dillon or Jones perform yeoman's work blocking an extra rusher.
With few remaining options, Rodgers holds the ball because what else is he supposed to do?
Agreed. I spent enough time defending him over the years during some of those Monday morning, frame by frame, birds eye view analysis going around. Like I said, have to take the good with the bad and I still love what the guy could and did do on the field for the Packers.
I also watched other guys around him not doing their jobs either.I like the argument because I watched it unfold in real time.
I also watched other guys around him not doing their jobs either.
A broken thumb and fractured ribs doesn’t help as well.
The Packers passing play percentage this season was almost identical to 2020 and was lower than 2021. So this idea that Rodgers somehow went rogue and gave MLF the proverbial middle finger is one that I can’t buy into.
I respect your interpretation of what happened with the offense. But I’d migrate more toward no Davante, rookies having to step in, injuries to Rodgers himself, offensive line up and down, and then there’s Rodgers himself that just didn’t play as well as he is capable of.
That pretty much sums it up for me. Guessing it feels somewhat like what an amicable divorce can feel like. 2 people that can still be friends and good people individually, but just tired of the BS that each brings to the collective table.If after all these years you couldn't see the relationship between GB and Aaron had run its course I think you put on some massive blinders. It was time, it is sad, it sucks, it is a relief all rolled into one big massive burrito.
Apparently it's so big, he might not be in the portion of the house that has cell service to see he has a missed call for months.Interesting reason for Gute not reaching Rodgers. "Sorry you couldn't reach me, my house is so big and beautiful that I lose cell service in parts of it" (paraphrasing...)
Ok then.
I think the lack of talent and injuries last year had more to do with his regression than a change of mindset. If he pulled the offense in the direction of his preferences, it was probably out of desperation. That doesn't make it the right thing to do, but I see it more as a symptom than a cause.Then they drafted Love, Rodgers leaned into LaFleur's scheme a lot more, and he won back to back MVP's. Last year, he pulled the offense back in the direction of his preferences, and he regressed.
I think the lack of talent and injuries last year had more to do with his regression than a change of mindset. If he pulled the offense in the direction of his preferences, it was probably out of desperation. That doesn't make it the right thing to do, but I see it more as a symptom than a cause.
He must have had a whole rash of symptoms that lasted all seasonI think the lack of talent and injuries last year had more to do with his regression than a change of mindset. If he pulled the offense in the direction of his preferences, it was probably out of desperation. That doesn't make it the right thing to do, but I see it more as a symptom than a cause.
Well saidThis IMO is as good as Gute was going to get.
See ya Aaron. It was great having you all these years and I wish you success with the Jets--just not against us. Made following the Packers fun but i'm looking forward to see the page turned.
Yes.Fact is his supporting cast struggled last year, excuses can be made but that was one factor in the struggle bucket…
So I hear the Jets have agreed to take on Rodgers contract. What does that mean for us exactly? Does that just save the organization some money, or does that actually take some of his salary cap burden off of us, and if so how much?
Yes.
So I hear the Jets have agreed to take on Rodgers contract. What does that mean for us exactly? Does that just save the organization some money, or does that actually take some of his salary cap burden off of us, and if so how much?