Packer Brother
Cheesehead
I believe fans boycotting the remaining home games may get Murphy's attention. It will show that fans are fed up with a mediocer product, and maybe he'll get to work.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
No...but maybe it's time for a few "fans" to get a life and realize this is a game. I love watching Packer games... I love going to Lambeau to watch a game when I can... and I love watching them win even more... but a boycot? lol no. I will simply keep living my life and watch the Packers win or lose when I can.I believe fans boycotting the remaining home games may get Murphy's attention. It will show that fans are fed up with a mediocer product, and maybe he'll get to work.
Thoughts?
Why not just put a bag over your head? Write "Hackers" on it with a Sharpie. You'll probably get on TV.I believe fans boycotting the remaining home games may get Murphy's attention. It will show that fans are fed up with a mediocer product, and maybe he'll get to work.
Thoughts?
Good callWhy not just put a bag over your head? Write "Hackers" on it with a Sharpie. You'll probably get on TV.
Going the cheap route repeatedly, and staying well under the spending cap every year does begin to raise a few questions.What’s the point? Do you not think they’re trying to put the absolute best team they can on the field? What possible good could come out of a boycott?
I agree with your first statement. The second part, while I hope and actually believe it to be true.... is frankly, irrelevant. Good times or bad, I have been a Packer fan for over 40 years and will continue to be one.I think it`s disgusting even to suggest this in the first place. We`re having a bad time, so what ?. I haven`t been a fan of the Packers as long as a lot of you but I`m as comitted to them as you are. It`s a slight blip and it will pass sooner or later.
That's what us oldtimers thought back in the 70's, you know, before the internet and people discussed things face to face.It`s a slight blip and it will pass sooner or later.
That's what us oldtimers thought back in the 70's, you know, before the internet and people discussed things face to face.
Every year we expected a turn around.
Then those years turned into decades.
No!But you never bailed on them did you ??
The Packers have currently $12.4 million in cap space. This amount represents the cumulative unused cap rolled over since the 2011 CBA. So, the unused cap over the past 7 seasons has averaged $1.8 million per year.Going the cheap route repeatedly, and staying well under the spending cap every year does begin to raise a few questions.
<following financial amounts are plucked from my ********** and have no real world basis>The Packers have currently $12.4 million in cap space. This amount represents the cumulative unused cap rolled over since the 2011 CBA. So, the unused cap over the past 7 seasons has averaged $1.8 million per year.
The issue is "how", not "how much".
Mike, you should stick to coaching and leave cap management to Thompson and Ball.
Brockington, ****ey-Lofton-Jefferson-Coffman, the Majical season. There were times of optimism, only to have all hope dashed upon the rocks of futility.That's what us oldtimers thought back in the 70's, you know, before the internet and people discussed things face to face.
Every year we expected a turn around.
Then those years turned into decades.
And I understand your reasoning, but I don't understand the problem.<following financial amounts are plucked from my ********** and have no real world basis>
I understand your reasoning but the innumeracy grates a bit. Roll over $10m, spend the $130m cap and you still have $10m to roll into next year. Roll $10k over, spend the $130m cap, and you have $10k to roll over. In both instances you have spent the same amount. In the first case people assume he is saving $10m from each season's cap. He isn't. There is just a rainy day fund carried forward that is never spent. So if he blows it all on resigning say Adams and Rodgers this season yet, next year there will not be the $10m or so rollover. He would have spent $140m this season which is in excess of the $130m cap but OK because of the carryover from last season.
it's also a business. would you go a restaurant that sold overpriced, mediocre, food just because you loved the location and back story? just saying. i think they're very aware of how the fans feel without boycotting.No...but maybe it's time for a few "fans" to get a life and realize this is a game. I love watching Packer games... I love going to Lambeau to watch a game when I can... and I love watching them win even more... but a boycot? lol no. I will simply keep living my life and watch the Packers win or lose when I can.
You can, and holiday dinners just might make you wish you had (airing of grievances, feats of strength, the Festivus pole).You can't boycott your own blood....
Sounds like you've been to Krohl's West "in the shadows of Lambeau Field." I am not a fan of that place.would you go a restaurant that sold overpriced, mediocre, food just because you loved the location and back story?