Cheese Headed Monster
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2018
- Messages
- 494
- Reaction score
- 62
Raptorman I see you voted yes, I would be okay with you putting him in the Vikings HoF instead of the Packers
Raptorman I see you voted yes, I would be okay with you putting him in the Vikings HoF instead of the Packers
lol...i used to (still ) say that about favre.Raptorman I see you voted yes, I would be okay with you putting him in the Vikings HoF instead of the Packers
you make some uncomfortablely good points.I think he gets in and it won't be a question. It's not like he assaulted someone sexually in a stairwell or something or did **** things with underage girls in a hot tub or anything that might keep him out. Oh wait, that's not really criteria either. Of course he gets in, easily I think.
lol...i used to (still ) say that about favre.
Nope. I'd expect HoF criteria to be much more than game stats.
He has been a negative influence over the team and organization and I think that should be enough to keep him out.
A slow clap for you digging this old topic back up.Since this seems to be a hot topic of discussion, I thought I would see if there was a thread.
In my opinion, had Jennings kept his mouth shut after leaving Green Bay, he is a guy who gets in. However, if the voting committee takes into account his post Packer life, I would say his continued negativity will keep him out. I guess I have no clue what a voting committee takes into account.
As a fan, I don't want to see him in, if I am basing my opinion on everything I know about the guy, not just what he did in a Packer uniform.
I can say this, if he is inducted, I can't imagine many people showing up for the ceremony.
Well a there’s one little difference. Sterling Sharpe and Robert Brooks player 15 total years combined in the NFL and 14 of those years (93.3%) were for us. 1 year was for an AFC team.Well, we gotta take Robert Brooks and Sterling Sharpe out of the Packers Hall of Fame then. They weren't the "driving force behind a SB win."
Ok, so at least you changed your "need to be the driving force behind a SB win" criteria for getting into the PHOF.Well a there’s one little difference. Sterling Sharpe and Robert Brooks player 15 total years combined in the NFL and 14 of those years (93.3%) were for us. 1 year was for an AFC team.
Greg Jennings played 70% of his career in GB.
In addition and more importantly, Greg Jennings is the only one of the 3 that likes to purposefully and willfully harass current team members out of spite. To put that in layman’s terms for you, He’s a jerk to the current Captain of our franchise and has been repeatedly supportive of negative comments about team members and coaches. He specifically (and without argument whatsoever) attack’s the Packers franchise on a regular basis has voiced nothing but ILL will for this team. Not a guy I want to offer a commendation award to.
If I’m an owner of a corporation and this guy is a past employee? I’m specifically putting a “do not hire” directive on him and making darn well sure HR is 100% clear that is known for any future inquiries concerning his reputation.
Poor example of character IMO.
But you’re exactly right, we will probably be politically correct here and do the wrong thing. But then again the world is full of weak people who make these decisions with no backbone, so I’m not surprised either way.
Both James Lofton and Mark Chmura were inducted into the PHOF and I would say their conduct off the field or at least what they were accused of, didn't seem to keep them out.
So Jennings simply being a vocal PITA may not keep him out either.
Previous pages are 5.5 yrs old but some were saying how the Vikings offered Jennings more to play for them which isn't correct. During his last season with GB the Packers had made him an offer "around" $10Mil/yr and Jennings didn't want it. Ended-up signing with the Vikes for $9Mil/yr. He wanted out of GB, and I'm OK with him (and Valyncia, his sister) being nowhere near the Packer's HOF.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap10...t-greg-jennings-offered-10m-a-year-by-packers
my grandma has crocheted little covers for all of her tissue boxes, does that count?
TECHNICALLY he had his best year statistically with them. I wonder have any other players made the HoF for two teams?
Just came from another site with a lot of Packer fans, and it was a good discussion about whether Jennings should go into the Packer Hall of Fame.
Some say his stats are pretty similar to Antonio Freeman, who's in, so yes they say Jennings should go in.
Other say he's maybe worthy, but the fact that he spurned the organizations strong attempt to keep him as a Packer, should keep him out of the Packer Hall.
Ted Thompson made a strong effort to keep Jennings. We all thought he was gone for sure and Ted wouldn't even try and keep him. We were wrong. Ted waited to extend Rodgers, Matthews, Raji, and said goodbye to Driver and didn't extend Finley, a lot of that was to leave money to keep Jennings.
Jennings got more money from the Grape Ape Nation, and he chose no.
I say for that, I choose no to him in our HOF.
He'll never make the NFL HOF.
Not everyone goes after every extra dollar, flees for the Enemy Purple.
See Driver.
What's your honest vote here, and there are no official criteria.
It's whatever you want, feel.
Driver already is in from this era at WR.
More production, and he didn't take the money to go to the Grape Side.
I vote no, and remember I LOVED this guy coming out of Western Michigan, met his parents at his first NFL game (home shutout loss to the Bears), and I like Jennings Faith.
But some of the things that his big-mouthed sister FOR SURE were ideas she heard from Greg.
He PLANNED on leaving....he expected Miami with Philbin to throw the money at him. But they preferred Mike Wallace.
So he got his next best wish, Minnesota and Adrian Peterson back there with him.
He betrayed the organization to take an extra year $.
For that, he makes this an easy NO for me.
You must be logged in to see this image or video!
montana maybe. reggie white for sure. peppers will.TECHNICALLY he had his best year statistically with them. I wonder have any other players made the HoF for two teams?
nah. he has a personal problem with rodgers but team-wise he's been fine.Nope. I'd expect HoF criteria to be much more than game stats.
He has been a negative influence over the team and organization and I think that should be enough to keep him out.
it's all over Green Bay/Milwaukee radio. LeRoy Butler says he should be.A slow clap for you digging this old topic back up.
He's become a butthead.
His play, however, merits induction.
He shouldn't count on a ceremony, however.
Good point. Let’s get him outa here!I mean, Kabeer is in and he isn't my favorite person and while he was a good player and a good pass rusher, he wasn't a great player IMHO.
TECHNICALLY he had his best year statistically with them. I wonder have any other players made the HoF for two teams?
I mean, Kabeer is in and he isn't my favorite person and while he was a good player and a good pass rusher, he wasn't a great player IMHO.
Do all other teams have a HOF?
Some of you would be surprised to hear Aaron Rodgers feelings on whether Greg Jennings should get into the Packers Hall Of Fame. I would direct you to find out the thoughts of the players that played with Greg on whether he is deserving of the honor.
Many people here also think that all Packers fans share their opinions. The majority of the people in one fan forum does not represent in any way the feelings of the whole fan base.
Actually most teams don't even have a HOF.
You're placing WAY too much value in Greg if you didn't believe he wasn't replaceable at the time. After his departure we still had Jordy, James Jones, and Cobb. We were still a formidable threat in the receiving corp as a unit. Then we got Devante.The guy bugs me but I don't know if we have ever really adequately replaced him all these years later.
Sure we had Jordy and Cobb and now Adam's but Jennings was a different type of threat.
I don't think you give him enough credit. Yeah, he was replaceable in the offense because we had 3 other guys that were pretty good. There's only 1 ball, 3 really good WR's is plenty, that's what made him replaceable.You're placing WAY too much value in Greg if you didn't believe he wasn't replaceable at the time. After his departure we still had Jordy, James Jones, and Cobb. We were still a formidable threat in the receiving corp as a unit. Then we got Devante.
I kind of find this a bit ironic in a sense since some of you were on the opposing side regarding letting Jordy go rather than keeping him. Clearly he was starting to become injury prone and he had a drop in production in which Jordy, James Jones and Randall Cobb, Jermichael Finley were beating him out. He wasn't the same dynamic playmaker and he wanted to be paid like one when he wasn't. Would he have been an asset on the team, no doubt, but letting him go was fine and a good call.I don't think you give him enough credit. Yeah, he was replaceable in the offense because we had 3 other guys that were pretty good. There's only 1 ball, 3 really good WR's is plenty, that's what made him replaceable.
But you're discounting what he did. Jordy had the back shoulder catches and long play actions. Jones was reliable after he worked on his hands. when it came to run after the catch, Cobb was a 2nd compared to Jennings. He turned guys in circles and was so smooth doing it you never even noticed. And he'd often take a short pass and turn it into 30, 40, 60 yards and never break stride. I'd love to have a guy like him back on this team. His best attributes were wasted in MN because Ponder couldn't throw a ball anywhere past 7 yards that wasn't over someone's head or at their feet.