Too simplified. If you look at his best seasons, those are seasons where he threw 16 or fewer picks. The seasons where he threw more than that we rarely had more than 10 wins.
If you have ever played golf or bowled, you know the answer to this. Sometimes its better to let the mechanics work themselves out, instead of trying to overcorrect and messing everything up. I still think he will be a good kicker, he just needs to keep kicking and get his head firmly around the idea that he can make every kick.
U R correct
Even a lot of the ones he makes.
That is part of youth. They can race in the car to a big event but get there and realize they forgot their wallet. They were able to get it done yesterday whereas in those first 5 losses those screw ups came back to haunt us. Good teams can win on not so good days.
And that 192 even includes the games when Fields was out due to injuries. You would think the Bears could have picked up on the Tampa and Carolina games.
They are deep at receiver it appears now. But if you trade him do it for a position player. There are plenty of decent kickers.
Kinda like me and golfing
I agree with everything. The only thing I can tell you is I rewatched that play and I could see within 3-6” of where Fields fell. it really was an accurate spot. If it was off? it was off by <6” which gets tedious.
Correct. I watched Santos on his 3 FGs. His kicks did move right but he knows his touch. Even his doink made it. Carlson is caught between deciding whether to measure his kick or to drive it. Crosby was similar in his early career but he picked up on it quickly. The kid has the leg but he has to have the touch.
Something I saw someone else state somewhere: Take away AJ33s 5 receptions for 30 yards and all the other passes caught and yards gained were by players that had never taken a snap in the NFL before the season began. Doubs dropped his one target before exiting with injury.
He did the same mess up right before halftime like Love did. No TOs left and hit a receiver that was drilled and stopped in the field of play with no time left for a FG.
I thought it was a FG.
This is the part where it becomes obvious that some people have lost their ******** minds on any kind of objectivity.
Now lets just slow down here for a minute. LOL Whaaat??!!!
Correct.
Okay, let me put it simple to you then. We KNOW the ceiling for those guys. We haven't seen Love's ceiling yet. So, no, I would not trade Love for either of them because we don't fully know what we have in him yet.
What the **** is that even supposed to mean? lol
Wipe...your....chin.
The part of your post that I 100% agree with is we don't yet know how good Love is going to be, but we can be very confident that the sky is the limit with this guy.
I would also throw in that we are paying Love a LOT less money, at least for now. Which will be a great off-season discussion in the forum. Just how big of a contract will the Packers offer Love and how big of a contract will Love want?
I doubt there is a Packer fan, with any common sense, that would ever propose trading Love right now. I don't even think I would trade him for the Bears first 2 picks (#1 and #10) and Justin Fields. Is Love a FHOF QB? Not sure, but I have liked what I have seen in his first year of starting and that was with all pretty green receivers. I do think the Packers will want to lock him in and give him a decent offer, but I hope its packed with incentives and not just another big guaranteed contract that could come back to bite them in the ****.
Our second stringers have started all year. Now you may be referring to third stringers.
