Free Agent Signings for Packers or Elsewhere...

Half Empty

Cheesehead
Joined
Oct 29, 2014
Messages
4,544
Reaction score
658
No problem with having some folks wait until opening day before commenting on the roster, et. al. See you in September, Mondio. :)
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
I did in the Superbowl, other than that it couldn't have been too impressive to end up with 2.5 at years end. If he was that good, they'd send him more. if they sent him more and he only ended up with 2.5 he can't be that good? he's a fine linebacker overall but if you're not a stud on the line, and pass rushing specialist, or a great cover guy, you'll have a tough time convincing me he's the guy we need to dedicate money to fix our defense.
 

PackerDNA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
6,754
Reaction score
1,701
I did in the Superbowl, other than that it couldn't have been too impressive to end up with 2.5 at years end. If he was that good, they'd send him more. if they sent him more and he only ended up with 2.5 he can't be that good? he's a fine linebacker overall but if you're not a stud on the line, and pass rushing specialist, or a great cover guy, you'll have a tough time convincing me he's the guy we need to dedicate money to fix our defense.

Day one in every phase and every way, he'd be better than anyone we have.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
of course he would, but 2.5 sacks from the ILB position aren't going to do much overall for us. Especially not for 10+ million a year. he better get me 8+ sacks per or 5 INT's and a crap load of defensed passes for that price
 

PackerDNA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jun 8, 2014
Messages
6,754
Reaction score
1,701
of course he would, but 2.5 sacks from the ILB position aren't going to do much overall for us. Especially not for 10+ million a year. he better get me 8+ sacks per or 5 INT's and a crap load of defensed passes for that price

My understanding is he was (is) a do everything guy for them, and hits like a truck.
Not sure on this - calling Captain Wimm !) but he was very effective when asked to blitz a high percentage of the time they sent him.
And you're getting less than half of all that overall from Matthews for $15M. And outside of the sacks in one year, less from Perry for $12M.
 

Mondio

Cheesehead
Joined
Dec 20, 2014
Messages
15,893
Reaction score
3,797
I'm not happy with Matthews either, but when he signed it was kind of obvious to keep him. He's underperforming and at a time when we're thin at the position. without a big bounce back this year, I expect him to be cut next year.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2014
Messages
15,799
Reaction score
6,766
looks like JCook heading to the Raiders
have fun in Vegas, buddy
I know it. TT must really be high on Martellus to give him a 3yr 21 mil deal and then to kick Cook only to sign a 2yr 12 mil contract. I hope old Martellus lives up to that contract we need him
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,682
Reaction score
1,967
Cook getting 2 year, $12.2M from Raiders.

Not sure how the FA losses and gains will cancel out in regards to comp picks.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
Cook getting 2 year, $12.2M from Raiders.

Not sure how the FA losses and gains will cancel out in regards to comp picks.

Well right now, the Packers have only signed one true UFA from the outside (Bennett) and have lost Lang, Hyde, Cook, Tretter, Lacy, Peppers, and Jones.

Kendricks don't count because they were roster cuts.

So basically as it stands at the moment the Packers will get the maximum of 4 comp picks next year. I would guess that it would be a 3rd or 4th for Lang, a 5th for Cook, and two 6th's for Tretter and Lacy.

They could still sign a UFA or two without really costing themselves picks because of how many guys have walked.
 

PikeBadger

Moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
6,682
Reaction score
1,967
Well right now, the Packers have only signed one true UFA from the outside (Bennett) and have lost Lang, Hyde, Cook, Tretter, Lacy, Peppers, and Jones.

Kendricks don't count because they were roster cuts.

So basically as it stands at the moment the Packers will get the maximum of 4 comp picks next year. I would guess that it would be a 3rd or 4th for Lang, a 5th for Cook, and two 6th's for Tretter and Lacy.

They could still sign a UFA or two without really costing themselves picks because of how many guys have walked.
What about House?
 

7thFloorRA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
331
Location
Grafton, WI
Well right now, the Packers have only signed one true UFA from the outside (Bennett) and have lost Lang, Hyde, Cook, Tretter, Lacy, Peppers, and Jones.

Kendricks don't count because they were roster cuts.

So basically as it stands at the moment the Packers will get the maximum of 4 comp picks next year. I would guess that it would be a 3rd or 4th for Lang, a 5th for Cook, and two 6th's for Tretter and Lacy.

They could still sign a UFA or two without really costing themselves picks because of how many guys have walked.
pretty sure there is a limit of 3.
 

7thFloorRA

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 19, 2011
Messages
2,573
Reaction score
331
Location
Grafton, WI
I thought you could have a max of 10 total picks so a traditional 7 with the 3 would fill your ticket. IDK though...just what I thought. You also dont alway get one so a piece of trash like Jones will not get one.
 

Dantés

Gute Loot
Joined
Jan 21, 2017
Messages
12,116
Reaction score
3,036
I thought you could have a max of 10 total picks so a traditional 7 with the 3 would fill your ticket. IDK though...just what I thought. You also dont alway get one so a piece of trash like Jones will not get one.

There's no max on total picks you can have, and I checked-- it is 4.
 

Sanguine camper

Cheesehead
Joined
Jan 14, 2014
Messages
2,150
Reaction score
730
Barwin just signed with the Rams. He never even visited Green Bay. The number of people who could be signed as potential starters is rapidly dwindling.
 

Members online

Top