Dantés
Gute Loot
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2017
- Messages
- 12,116
- Reaction score
- 3,036
I think this highlighted part is where you and I disagree on the Diggs trade and is why I said it seemed like you were viewing it in a vacuum. How do you just ignore it and put "lockerroom stuff aside"? I think many of us have been on some kind of team, whether its sports, business, whatever. When you have one teammate that is disruptive, no matter how talented he is, it can be a negative to the whole team. I'm not saying that Diggs will be that way in Buffalo, but it sure sounds like he was in Minnesota. I am guessing that the Vikings felt this was a good deal for them and a way to get rid of a guy that was becoming a distraction. The Bills and yourself, perhaps don't view it in the same way and thus view it as a better deal for Buffalo. Like I said, hard to tell on any deal, until it plays out. I can see either side thinking it was a good deal, otherwise, why make the deal?
I'll try this one more time.
Because of his relationship to the team, I said out of the gate that this was the right move for the Vikings in the long term.
But because Stefon Diggs was their best offensive player, I am saying that *if you choose to look just at the on-field perspective* they got a lot worse for the immediate future.