3 players are out of $, 3 have some up to half, and 4 have barely touched theirs if at all. It could be 3 times the amount and you'd still have about the same situation. I think this is more driven (IMO) by players that shot their *** early in the season getting outbid now for the late bloomers and prospects. I think you know my vote on this.
Ok, so which is it?
What you're not understanding is that I'm not arguing for something in an attempt to change anyone's spending habits. In fact I acknowledged as much on post #474 of the previous page. To reiterate further my intent behind bringing the idea up, I think it will cause more players to be bid over which is a good thing imo. Please don't trying and characterise my motives for bringing this up as anything other than a desire to increase the competitive nature of the league, as it is simply that.
What happened in the PFFFL this year wood?
I am too cute for you to meet me IRL
Are you ever not willing to trade? =P
I no longer write for DFW.
Then why keep any? Get a bad team? Next year you shuffle most of the deck except the value cards. Not what I signed up for.
You are describing a keeper league. This is a dynasty league.
We can still change the amount of players we keep
No, then the entire league is changed. A dynasty league means you keep every player you want.
He told me to tell you heck no, what an asinine concept. Now pick dag nabbit and get the ball rolling.
He told me to tell you heck no, what an asinine concept. Now pick dag nabbit and get the ball rolling.
Oh yeah, that's right. Wake me on Wednesday.You don't even have any picks in the first 2 rounds, so shh you!
