D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
Our wide receivers look better when MVS and EQ are on the bench.
Unfortunately with Lazard still out the Packers don't hav more talented receivers than MVS or EQ aside of Adams.
Our wide receivers look better when MVS and EQ are on the bench.
DK Metcalf is looking good. Just sayin'.
I think we are better with Taylor and Shepherd out there. Along with TEs. But yes, Lazard is number two. EQ and MVS make too many mistakes.Unfortunately with Lazard still out the Packers don't hav more talented receivers than MVS or EQ aside of Adams.
I think we are better with Taylor and Shepherd out there. Along with TEs. But yes, Lazard is number two. EQ and MVS make too many mistakes.
I agree except that I think people jumped on him too quickly and have given the two late round picks too much leeway based on perceived potential and 40 times.Shepherd is VERY quickly becoming more and more dependable. I love what he is doing in limited snaps and on STs. Little bit of a redemption story with him.
Are you Brandon in disguise?
But yeah, he has been looking real good in what I've seen
Unfortunately with Lazard still out the Packers don't hav more talented receivers than MVS or EQ aside of Adams.
I think today if he's ready.When can Lazard come off the IR?
I agree except that I think people jumped on him too quickly and have given the two late round picks too much leeway based on perceived potential and 40 times.
What is crazy is a lot of folks were excited about MVS
When you have a blazing rocket that excelled early in yards receiving more than most rookies in the organization folks were justified in being excited.
However, like many of us kept stressing unless he can learn better route running he is purely a run fast type of guy...
Metcalf is a beast. But he was drafted at the end of the second round for reasons. I had him down my list of wide receiver because of the flaws numerous scouting reports had on him. Man where we wrong
Ya, someone on here was banging the drum hard for Metcalf and a lot of us, including myself just weren't seeing it because of those flaws. I'll eat crow and admit I was wrong. He would have been a great get.
Him, Brown, or Debo...any of them are way better than MVS
As far as I remember it wasn't a them or MVS selection choice? All of them were long gone by the time MVS was selected, so that never was the choice before Gute.
That wasn’t my point. My point is had they taken any of those three we would t have to see dudes like MVS who can’t run routes and EQ who can’t make the big catch out there. That’s the point
I think we are better with Taylor and Shepherd out there. Along with TEs. But yes, Lazard is number two. EQ and MVS make too many mistakes.
I'm beginning to like Malik Taylor and things could be improving when Lazard returns. We have a good enough QB to make this work with these 2 and Adams at WR.
When can Lazard come off the IR?
We gave MVS a long look. I don't think we need to give EQ more. Taylor and Shepherd have not had a good chance yet so we just don't know. But Taylor seems to get open when he is out there. Sternberger seems to get open also.Taylor and Shepherd shouldn't be counted to have a consistent impact when receiving increased snaps either.
We gave MVS a long look. I don't think we need to give EQ more. Taylor and Shepherd have not had a good chance yet so we just don't know. But Taylor seems to get open when he is out there. Sternberger seems to get open also.
I like looking at what we can do best with what we have. I think Shepherd and Taylor with using Sternberger more is what we should be doing.The Packers need more talent at the receiver position than Shepherd or Taylor to actually excel against good defenses.
Taylor and Shepherd shouldn't be counted to have a consistent impact when receiving increased snaps either.
No, it's completely unrealistic to expect Rodgers to make it work against good defenses with the current receiving corps.
Lazard could have already been activated last week.