D
Deleted member 6794
Guest
As I think many of us would be overall. However, correct me if I'm wrong we restructure his 2024 hit is just going to be ludacris and we are right back where we are no?
Jones is set to hit our cap with like $20M for round figures, ignorantly high for a RB this day and age...likewise a restructure only seems to have about the ability to save $4M of that....$16M is still crazy to spend on a RB especially if we're in a reset/rebuild mentality for a year.
The Packers could convert Jones base salary in 2023 and '24 as well as his roster bonus due in March into a signing bonus of $24 million and sign him to an extension through the 2026 season. That would result in his cap hit dropping to approximately $12 million for each of the next two seasons. There would be a significant of dead money being left counting against the team's cap for 2025 at $13.5 million though.
If the Packers decide to pay Jones his roster bonus of $7 million in March and then trade him that move would result in a total of $16.5 million of dead money counting against their cap with either all of it in 2023 or spread out over the next two years. That's not gonna happen.
I just don't see how the QB doesn't change the mindset of the future and how we tackle 2023 and into 2024 for that matter. If Rodgers is here, it's because this organization is going to "run it back" for like the fourth time and no doubt resign at minimum I'd suspect a couple of the four/five guys Rodgers has specifically brought up in discussions of future; Lazard, Tonyan, Lewis, Crosby, Cobb.
I have no issue, despite disagreement, with that tactic if that is the decision you make at QB. That said, if you roll to the future, a massive cap reset is needed and that cannot truly be accomplished without some removal of big contracts off the books and if able replace with rookie deals. I'm not saying getting rid of Jones makes this team better from a weapons, W/L column or the running back room specifically...however the logic of removing him whether by cut, pay and trade or trade (doubtful at his cost presently before that bonus is paid) is something I understand as needed sadly if that is the direction we start rolling - even if it means saying goodbye to probably one of my favorite GB Packers presently playing for us.
I definitely agree the Packers will take a different approach depending on if Rodgers or Love is their quarterback in 2023. But they need to surround Love with some talent if he ends up being the starter as well.
I only can speak for me, but I see logic and think many may feel same way in the organization. If you go to Love, I personally feel only those ignorant to reality would think we have the same shot at success at least initially in his "growing pains" year of 2023. Now don't take that wrong though - I don't think Green Bay ends up much worse than they did in 2022 had Love started than we did with Rodgers...but I think best case you get lucky, win some close ones and Love in year one has us in a similar 2023 situation maybe fighting for a bottom wildcard spot...but either way 2023 is the "figure out" year and is all about IMO setting up for 2024.
I highly doubt the Packers will end up fighting for a playoff spot if they end up starting Love in 2023 while trying to fix the cap situation this offseason. In that vase they will rather compete for the #1 overall draft pick in 2024.