BrokenArrow
Cheesehead
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2017
- Messages
- 2,972
- Reaction score
- 1,412
Here is why this makes no sense. One of the primary benefits of having a young QB1 is to make a run on their rookie deal. Performance vs pay scale is never as lopsided in the teams favor as it is on a team with a rookie deal QB1. This is why we saw team like Seattle, LA, Baltimore and many others build teams that made deep runs, they could afford to add these pieces without paying their QB.
Fast forward, ideally we get what 1 year of rookie deal without also paying Rodgers and then have to choose to either pay him starter money or let him walk? Putting yourself in a tight spot, you'll almost certainly have to give him a second contract at starter market rates, and hope for the best. If he doesn't pan out at that point you've set your team behind by 7-8 years!
You're assuming Rodgers is going to be here four more years. Remains to be seen. I don't think he has four good years left.