ls1bob
Cheesehead
Dud is the Vikings DB corps. Heard they went rogue on Zimmer first half. Studs for us. All around offensive effort! Jordy is a beast
Dud. Packers Defense. Other than the one forced fumble. 475 yards from an offense with a makeshift line.
Last two weeks.
924 yards
52 points
Against a 2nd string QB and a team with a makeshift O-line playing 3rd stringers.
If they play like this in the playoffs, they will be one and done.
5 and 0 to?Dud. Packers Defense. Other than the one forced fumble. 475 yards from an offense with a makeshift line.
Last two weeks.
924 yards
52 points
Against a 2nd string QB and a team with a makeshift O-line playing 3rd stringers.
If they play like this in the playoffs, they will be one and done.
Lmao .... while all this may be true... you won't find me in a Viking Forum picking them apart the next time they soundly beat the Packers while they are in a 5 game winning streak.Dud. Packers Defense. Other than the one forced fumble. 475 yards from an offense with a makeshift line.
Last two weeks.
924 yards
52 points
Against a 2nd string QB and a team with a makeshift O-line playing 3rd stringers.
If they play like this in the playoffs, they will be one and done.
Yeah. I think the Vikings did also and I think them respecting our run game was partly what opened up the Vikings secondary.Good game all around! Rodgers is on point, the offensive line protected well, the receivers were outstanding, and defense force timely turnovers.
I did expect the running back to be a little better than it was today.
Dud. Packers Defense. Other than the one forced fumble. 475 yards from an offense with a makeshift line.
Last two weeks.
924 yards
52 points
Against a 2nd string QB and a team with a makeshift O-line playing 3rd stringers.
If they play like this in the playoffs, they will be one and done.
Catch the ball Devante.
Pass defense is really bad as a whole.
A punter is a need. Schum is not that good.
Rollins is a guy drafted in the 2nd who had no business going there. If he was a 5th rounder I'd be more patient with him because that's what he plays like.
Dud. Packers Defense. Other than the one forced fumble. 475 yards from an offense with a makeshift line.
Last two weeks.
924 yards
52 points
Against a 2nd string QB and a team with a makeshift O-line playing 3rd stringers.
If they play like this in the playoffs, they will be one and done.
Sorry if the truth hurts. I have never made any predictions about my team that weren't true. Nor will I make any about the Packers that are not true. Fact is, the Vikings offensive line sucks. The fact that they put up 475 yards against you defense should worry you. They are 30th in the league in offensive yards so far this year. The deference in this game was two turnovers by...................the Vikings offensive line. And if you think that strip sack of Bradford was all Clay Matthews, you should check on the rating of the Vikings left tackle. He is rated as the worst in the league, and is responsible for probably 80% of Bradford's turnovers.Lmao .... while all this may be true... you won't find me in a Viking Forum picking them apart the next time they soundly beat the Packers while they are in a 5 game winning streak.
In the first half, I'll give you that. At the half the Packers had 302 yards of offense, the Vikings had 276. Packers ended up with 348 nets yards, Vikings 446. Now, lets talk about that Packers stud defense and offense in the second half. Full Strength. Like having of our top two DT on injured reserve? Yeah, ok.Man if the Packers defense was a dud what would you say the vikings defense was? The Vikings had 13 points at the under 5 minute mark in the 4th quarter when the game was over. It was not a great yardage game but if the Packers defense is giving up 13 late in games they are going to win a lot.
But honestly why come here just to post a dud. You couldn't find a stud to put on there? Like the Packer's offense that destroyed that elite defense over there. An elite defense playing at full strength too.
Ryan was a good pick. And Randall received a very good grade on PFF. But overall, this defense is garbage and looks like they'll be responsible for yet another playoff exit.I thought Joe Thomas and Jake Ryan played really well
Catch the ball Devante.
Pass defense is really bad as a whole.
A punter is a need. Schum is not that good.
Rollins is a guy drafted in the 2nd who had no business going there. If he was a 5th rounder I'd be more patient with him because that's what he plays like.
Don't have a poodle. BTW, they are great hunting dogs.I hope Raptorman's poodle has a really good hiding place.
Sorry if the truth hurts. I have never made any predictions about my team that weren't true. Nor will I make any about the Packers that are not true. Fact is, the Vikings offensive line sucks. The fact that they put up 475 yards against you defense should worry you. They are 30th in the league in offensive yards so far this year. The deference in this game was two turnovers by...................the Vikings offensive line. And if you think that strip sack of Bradford was all Clay Matthews, you should check on the rating of the Vikings left tackle. He is rated as the worst in the league, and is responsible for probably 80% of Bradford's turnovers.
If the Packer's want to go far in the playoffs, assuming they make it, their defense is going to have to get better and get better fast.
And for your information the title of the thread is "Studs and Duds". If you think the Packers Defense was a stud during the game tell me how. BTW, the Packers offense, that stud offense, had 63 yards of offensive production in the second half. They did all their damage in the first half. Maybe you should worry about that as well.
My team, they were done weeks ago. I know the weakness's of my team.
lol Relax.... I wasn't offended nor do I disagree with anything you have said... I just found it ironic that you were posting it. Further as someone that is here quite often, I think you know that most rational posters in this forum are well aware of these facts as well.Sorry if the truth hurts. I have never made any predictions about my team that weren't true. Nor will I make any about the Packers that are not true. Fact is, the Vikings offensive line sucks. The fact that they put up 475 yards against you defense should worry you. They are 30th in the league in offensive yards so far this year. The deference in this game was two turnovers by...................the Vikings offensive line. And if you think that strip sack of Bradford was all Clay Matthews, you should check on the rating of the Vikings left tackle. He is rated as the worst in the league, and is responsible for probably 80% of Bradford's turnovers.
If the Packer's want to go far in the playoffs, assuming they make it, their defense is going to have to get better and get better fast.
And for your information the title of the thread is "Studs and Duds". If you think the Packers Defense was a stud during the game tell me how. BTW, the Packers offense, that stud offense, had 63 yards of offensive production in the second half. They did all their damage in the first half. Maybe you should worry about that as well.
My team, they were done weeks ago. I know the weakness's of my team.
Maybe you should look at how the defense stopped the Vikings in the first half. Wait, they didn't. The Vikings offensive line stopped themselves. A fumble from the snap? A strip sack from Clay that went around the worst left tackle in the league?We would also look at the defense during the whole winning streak and see that it's been good throughout it.
Once again, the end of the Vikings game was meaningless as their only goal was to keep the clock moving, which they accomplished. Looking just at the numbers is not a good judge of the game.
The 4th quarter vs the Bears was bad, but that's been about it during the last five games.