I don't know if he's going to be a bust or not. What I do know is to this point, he's contributed bey little, and hasn't been anywhere as near as good as the two layers drafted behind him.....I think it's fair to ask, Why not?
It certainly is fair to ask why not and the answer simply may be he was not as talented to begin with than the others and maybe the draft order on them should have been different. I'm not saying it is wrong to be disappointed. After all we all have high hopes for all Packers draft picks. I just think expectations may have been a little high and maybe a little skewed based on draft order. If we switched Moore's numbers with St. Brown or Valdes-Scantling would you be equally disappointed in either of them? We drafted WRs in rounds 4 5 6 and we all want them to succeed but realistically if one of them turns out to be a solid contributor, one is an average spot player and one is a failure I think that is about the best we can hope for. If that happens it won't really matter to me which one is which and I won't be particularly disappointed in any of them because I wasn't really expecting more from any of them in particular.