With the Lions at 6-7 and the Packers at 5-8, assuming both teams were to win out a head-to-head victory would put them tied on record at 9-8. And in this event as far as I've seen it play out the tiebreaker would come down to strength of victory and/or strength of schedule which is of course out of our hands.
I never made any argument saying that our notable repetitive fumbling in postseason was the only cause to our defeat. I would disagree with that assertion, although it wasn’t from me. It’s possible you mistakenly addressed me as saying that but that another poster said this?? Idk. I simply said we needed to focus on not fumbling in cold weather games. Further I displayed it with proof. Then you backed it by saying we’ve fumbled a high number of times. believe you posted it was like 7 fumbles?? I thank you for scraping up that factual statistic. For myself, it only proves my point even more.
I hate to mention it because I like A. Jones so much, but those fumbles on the passes to the flat where really backbreakers. But I blame them almost as much on Rodgers who should have known better than to not throw those balls at his feet. It was so obvious the plays were going to be for losses and Jones was going to get clobbered.
Just to let you know this is Not a good look here, you’ve kept a simple post in flux over self pride. I’ve had X girlfriends that bickered over less and that’s being very honest. Lol
packerswire.usatoday.com
That's called just not thinking.
hate to break it to you, but many of the plays they put in special every week depend on a playmaker to make 1 guys miss. They think about it all the time.
Sometimes a play is doomed. The QB should be able to see that and throw the ball in the dirt. Those plays to Jones were doomed. imho
Good stuff.
I would love to see the Packers play the 9ers. I want to see if there's a different answer to my question.
sometimes they are, but plays where you can catch, turn and run, are not "doomed" plays. So, I'd disagree they were "doomed"
But there's some that find absolutely every way possible to blame the QB. By pointing out their perception may be skewed it makes you a "Rodgers Lover" and "Apologist" thereby making it easy to dismiss anything you might say.
Would be much better if you put the whole play on screen
I will only offer this. I Never would’ve expected it either. If GB wins their last 4 they have better than 50%+ chance of a #7 seed. If I have this correct, That % goes up markedly with Giants loss this week and the Giants OR Seattle losing next week.
