longtimefan said:Well this link takes into account more then just yards allowed ( which is how the D last year achieved their rankings of #1 and #7, that people like to mention..)
source
Ranked #18 which is more then 16..
16 is half of 32 ( for # of teams) ...So 16~~~most people would call that the AVERAGE..
Since 18 is more then 16 the D last year was BELOW AVERAGE..
Bate sIMO did an excellent job with what he had to work with..
But I think last year people were willing to give him TIME to make it work, this year no one seems willing to do that.
That's because this year we are not 1st, 7th, 16th or 18th... We are 31st in total defense. Since there are 32 teams in the league (as you pointed out), that makes us one position better than absolute worst. Even with Slowit at the helm we never sunk this low, and this abysmal display probably answers Blackjackking's question why a lot of us are upset that Bates is gone.
However, I am sure the facts are not going to get in the way of some posters here from continuing to argue that Sanders is a better choice for DC than Bates, or from denying the fact that our defense has majorly declined under the direction of Sanders. Some of the posts I have read lately would have you believe that the Packers are 4-1 with a guaranteed playoff berth and a chance at winning the Superbowl. :roll:
GO PACK!!!
Robert C. Hedley
[EDIT] I noticed my Karma has declined from 1 to -2 since I started posting in this thread. I guess the truth hurts after all.
:whippin:
I do not think I said Sanders is as good as or better then Bates, all I was doing was pointing out that Bates got the D last year to be just AVERAGE or slightly below average..
I think one of the biggest things from this year compared to last year is the D's ability to seem to stop a team when it gets in the red zone.
This year the D is ranked #7 in that stat..15 poss~~6 tds, 6 fg...
red zone stats
Last years stats 15 poss ~~9 tds, 4 fgs after 5 games ranked 27th
2005 , 5 games red zone
They have more sacks after 5 games then what the d had last year after 5 games and rank #10
But this years D is giving up the bigger plays that are TDS than what last years D did...I think that is what people are noticing, and rightly so...Stop giving up those types of TDs on the big pass plays and the D would be just about AVERAGE..
They have given up 28 20+ yard pass plays..and rank last..Indy has only given up 6...
they have given up 6 40+ yard pass plays, and rank near bottom, Indy has given up NONE..
Those big plays are a result of what I think DB being out of postion for what ever reason, which never seemed to happen with last years D..